Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />?age 5 <br /> <br />City Council Mi~u~es <br />February 6. 1989 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />G City Engineer Policy for Urban Improvement Proiects <br /> <br />The City Engineer submitted a proposal to the Council which would require <br />urban developers to use the City Engineer in lieu of their own engineer. <br />He stated that several problems arise by allowing developers to use their <br />own engineert Some of which are efficiency; coordina~ion of projects; <br />cocpliance to City and State laws; less City Staff involvecent; overall <br />scope; and interest conflict. <br /> <br />COUNCILMtMllER KROPUENSKE MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 89-12. A RESOLUTION <br />ADOPTING CERTAIN POLICIES REGARDING ENGINEERING SERVICES. COUNCILMEMBER <br />DOBEL SECONDED TIlE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. <br /> <br />5.9. Central Business District Riverbank <br /> <br />, <br />The City En ineer indicated that he has Contac ed a number of agencies to <br />inquire abo t programs that help fund er sion control projects along <br />river banks. e indicated that the only pro ~am that could possibly help <br />fund an eros n control project is coor nated by the Sewer and Water <br />Conservation D trict. He further indica ed that applications for this <br />program are due April I, 1989. <br /> <br /> <br />5.11."Dam" Bridge Update <br /> <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER KRO UENSKE MOVED TO AUTHO <br />UP ON THE POSSIBILI OF RECEIVING MONEY <br />COUNCILMEMBER SCHULD SECONDED TIlE MOTI <br /> <br />ZE THE CITY' ENGINEER TO FOLLOW <br />OR RIVERllANK EROSION SOLUTIONS. <br />THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. <br /> <br />...< <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />10) <br /> <br />Terry Maurer~ <br /> <br />that he has been checking into the <br />for the construction of a bridge <br />stated that there would possibly <br />It was the consensus of the City <br /> <br />over" <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER DOBEL MOVED TO <br />COST OF CONSTRUCTING A BRID <br />COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED <br /> <br />CT TIlE CITY ENGINEER TO INVESTIGATE THE <br />AT WACO STREET OVER TIlE ELK RIVER. <br />MOTION. TIlE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The City Engineer that the Sherburne County <br />P~storical Society has requ sted to 'ify the bridge at Main Street and <br />Orono Road ould, therefore, like the bridge <br />preserved. The City Eng Deer stated hat the bridge is in very poo~ <br />condition and stated that it should be rebu' t. He indicated he and Phil <br />Hals, Street Superinten nt. would be doing ome investigation into this <br />matter and would be ontacting the Histo.ical Society with their <br />findings. <br /> <br />6.1. Cell Special City Council Meeting <br /> <br />Tne City Administrator indicated that due to the agenda being completed <br />at this ~eeti~g, there was no need to call for a special Council ~eeting <br />to finish this agenda. <br />