My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2.B. SR 06-11-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2007
>
06/11/2007
>
5.2.B. SR 06-11-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:56 AM
Creation date
6/8/2007 9:21:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/11/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />Overview / Analysis <br /> <br />'Ibis property is located within the downtown task force study area. There is no moratorium in <br />place to prohibit land use requests in the area. A pteliminary redevelopment plan for the area is not <br />expected to be completed until later this summer. A final, approvable pho is expected by the end of <br />the year. <br /> <br />City Staff is working with the applicant on a series of issues, including access, layout, hod use type, <br />wethnd and water impacts, parking, and hodscaping. Any direction tegarding these issues will be <br />helpful to Staff and the applicant as further plans are developed. <br /> <br />At its workshop meeting on May 22, 2007, the Phoning Commission provided feedback. Mr. Briggs <br />was not in attendance, but was represented by an associate. The Planning Commission had no great <br />concern with apartments (versus the previously approved townhomes) but questioned what market <br />rate apartments meant. The Commission felt that building materials and design characteristics <br />would be an important component of a successful application. The Commission also felt that the <br />layout was inconsistent with the goals of that area, and felt the previously approved layout, with a <br />greater street presence, building type, etc, better fit the vision of that area. The Commission felt that <br />parking should be hidden from view of the street. There was some concern with the intention of <br />the northern third of the ptoperty, that area marked as "mixed use, etc." Furthet information will <br />be provided at the meeting. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />Direction and discussion regarding the proj ect. <br /> <br />Respectfully Submitted <br /> <br />9:>~ <br /> <br />Jeremy Barnhart <br />Planning Managet <br /> <br />Action <br /> <br />Motion by_ <br /> <br />Second by _ <br /> <br />Vote_ <br /> <br />Follow Up <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.