Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I ~\( <br />( i! <br />IIi{ River <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />PAT KLAERS, CITY AD~TOR <br />SEPTEMBER 15, 1994 'V' <br />SHIELY PARK DEDICATION OFFER <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />For complete details on the Shie1y park dedication offer, please the attached material and <br />report from Steve Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator. In line with how the Shiely <br />Company has always dealt with Elk River, this very cooperative offer provides the City <br />with an opportunity to address one of its open space and park concerns. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Everyone agrees that this 50 acres in question should be preserved and obtained by the <br />City for park purposes. The only concern I have with the opportunity to preserve this area <br />is with the method being proposed. I believe that the City should seriously consider <br />purchasing some of this land and not use the park dedication approach for the entire 50 <br />acres. This is different than the recommendation from the Park and Recreation <br />Commission and different from the offer from the Shiely Company. Steve Rohlfs <br />approach to finalizing the land transaction is valid regardless if 30 or 50 acres is accepted <br />through the park dedication method. <br /> <br />The Park and Recreation Commission indicated that they did not believe that they will <br />need a park in the remaining developable area that would be applied against this 50 acre <br />park dedication offer; and they may be correct. One example of the lesser need for parks <br />in large lot subdivisions are the Greenhead Additions in this vicinity. However, the <br />Greenhead Additions have lots that are larger than 2\1, acres per lot. Accordingly, the <br />need for parks in the future developable area may be questionable, especially if the <br />situation changes in 15 years and this area were to develop with municipal sewer and <br />water. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Even if everyone accepts the premise that no additional park land is needed in the future <br />in this vicinity for neighborhood parks, we still have to consider the revenues that would <br />be generated by the 450 remaining acres based on park dedication rates in 15 years. Once <br />again, this is especially true if the development occurs with municipal sewer and water, <br />and the number of units turns out to be one house every one-half acre versus one house <br />every two and one-half acres. Our park dedication amount is based on the number of <br />housing units. It is conceivable that this revenue in the future may be more valuable to <br />the City for park development than current dollars are to pay for all or part of 50 acres. <br /> <br />P.O. Box 490 . 13065 Orono Parkway · Elk River, MN 55330 · (612) 441-7420 · Fax: (612) 441-7425 <br />