Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(3) The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion <br />and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and drainage are suitable Jor the type and density of development and uses <br />mntemplated <br />(4) The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision Jor water supply, storm drainage, sewage transportation, erosion <br />control and all other services, facilities and improvements otherwise required in this article. <br />(5) The proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage. <br />(6) The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established hy judgment of a court. <br />(7) The proposed subdivision will not have an undue and adverse impad on the reasonable development of neighboring <br />land. <br />(8) The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: <br />a. Lack of adequate stormwater drainage. <br />b. Lack of adequate roads. <br />c. La,k of adequate sanitary sewer systems. <br />d Lack of adequate offsite public improvements' or support systems. <br /> <br />In the review of the standards for fmal plat as outlined, it appears that the request is consistent with all of <br />these standards. <br /> <br />Analysis <br />The proposal subdivides lot 3, block 1 of Rohlfs addition into 3 lots (2 new lots). <br /> <br />Comprehensive Plan <br /> <br />The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation for the property. <br /> <br />Lots / density - The lot sizes as proposed include: <br /> <br />Lot 1: <br />Lot 2: <br />Lot 3: <br /> <br />21,015 square feet, 90.03 feet offrontage <br />27,860 square feet, 108 feet of frontage <br />24,685 square feet, 100.91 feet of frontage. <br /> <br />All lots meet minimum lot size, lot width, lot depth requirements for the R-1c zoning district (11,000; 80, <br />130), and provide adequate area for future house construction. Density proposed is consistent with that <br />prescribed in the comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />Transportation <br />Streets - The property is adjacent to Meadowvale (CR 44) Road, also known as County Road 44. The <br />County indicated their need for 50' of right of way, measured from the centerline of the road. The plan <br />shows an additional 1 T of right-of-way along the north side of the existing right of way, meeting the <br />County's requirement. The County has also stipulated access locations. Lots 2 and 3 will share the <br />existing access currently serving the house on Lot 2. An easement across lot 2 for the benefit of lot 3 will <br />be necessary prior to release of the final plat. Lot 1 will utilize an existing curb cut. There will be no <br />increase in the number of curb opening serving the property. No other street improvements are <br />proposed. <br /> <br />Trails - The comprehensive trail plan suggests need for a trail along Meadowvale (CR 44). Although no <br />sidewalks or trails are proposed along the north side of Meadowvale (CR 44) (CR 44), the Park and <br />Recreation Commission recommends a 10' easement along the length of Meadowvale (CR 44) (CR 44) <br />adjoining the subject plat be provided. <br /> <br />C'\Documents and Scrtinl'."\;miller\Local Sertings\Temporary lntemet Files\OLK3E\Staff report to CC (3)_doc <br />