5.3.B. SR 05-14-2007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

It is important to note that this is not a formal request to amend the land use plan, and the PC and CC are not obligated to approve a formal application once received. The Concept review is beneficial for the Planning Commission and City Council (to be aware of major developments being contemplated and provide initial feedback), staff (to understand PC and CC concerns, and desires with the project), and the applicant (to get an understanding of the major issues observed by staff, PC, and CC). Following input regarding the concept plans, staff will work with Mr. Draeger towards development of a proposal that meets Council's stated and published goals. The Proposal City staff has been approached by Michael Draeger with a proposal to build a large scale, indoor ski, snowboard and recreational facility. See attached narrative description. The 240,000 square foot facility would include 50,000 square feet of complimentary retail and eating establishments, a 130' high indoor ski hill, ice rinks, and other features, would be located in approximately 60 acres south of 175" and east of Twin Lakes road, northeast of the future train station. The property is currently guided for high density residential and zoned R-la. The property is not currently within the urban services district, although with the existing guided land use, it appears that the expansion of the district to include the subject property was anticipated. A conceptual layout of the approximately 80 acres of gross land area shows a hotel on the west edge of the proposed development, the main entertainment venue in the middle, and two 45 unit, 3 story residential buildings on the east side. A large parking lot serves the facility. No changes are proposed to the wetland complex to the south. The site was chosen by the applicant due in part to the transportation network (proximity to the train station, Highways 10 and 169). Elk River is desired due to it's proximately to two population centers (Twin Cities and St. Cloud). The concept review is purposely general, more detailed information will be necessary as part of formal submittal for land use change. This will include environmental, utility, parking, and traffic impacts, architecture of the building, landscaping, etc. Again, the request is to understand interest in changing the existing land use to accommodate a land use that was not anticipated at the time the Comprehensive Plan was drafted. Planning Commission Reaction The Planning Commission reviewed the concept review, and had some comments and concerns to be addressed as part of the formal center. A complete synopsis, prepared for the applicant, dated April 27, 2007 is attached. The focus of the concerns was twofold: . Is this the best location for it, and . What are the infrastructure impacts (streets, utilities) and demands. There was a fair amount of comment suggesting that the City owned property south of the train station (Gateway) would be a better fit. Recommendation Staff is requesting direction and identification of concerns and issues as the applicant prepares formal application.