Laserfiche WebLink
<br />M~ <br /> <br />ITEM 7.2. <br /> <br />CONSULTING ENGINEERS August 18, 1994 <br />File: 230-215-58 <br /> <br />CIVil ENGiNEERING. <br /> <br />ENV,IWNMENT Ai <br /> <br />,VlUNIClPAl <br /> <br />,oIANNING <br /> <br />STRUCTURAL <br /> <br />.SURVEYING <br /> <br />TRAme <br /> <br />TRANSPORTATION <br /> <br />1326 Energy Pork Drive <br />St. Paul, MN 55108 <br />612-644-4389 <br /> <br />Fox: 612-644-9446 <br /> <br />.9800 Shelord Porkway <br />Minneapolis, MN 55441 <br /> <br />612-546-0432 <br />Fox: 612-544-6398 <br /> <br />Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />City of Elk River <br />13065 Orono Parkway <br />P.O. Box 490 <br />Elk River, MN 55330 <br /> <br />RE: NORTHEAST AREA UTILITY IMPROVEMENT <br />ASSESSMENT HEARING <br /> <br />Dear Council Members: <br /> <br />As you are aware, the assessment hearing for the Northeast Area Trunk Sanitary Sewer, <br />Watermain, and 193rd Avenue Improvements is scheduled for Monday evening's City <br />Council meeting. The notices that were mailed to the individual property owners reflected <br />an assessment rate of $3,800 per acre. This was due to the fact that the discussion on the <br />actual rate was not held prior to the date that the notices needed to be sent. As we discussed <br />at the last City Council meeting, the revised rate will be $2,588 per acre plus an amount yet <br />to be determined for deferral of green acred property. It is our understand that those <br />properties which have previously executed Developer's Agreements would remain at the <br />contractual amount of $3,800 per acre as spelled out in the agreements. <br /> <br />As of this time, staff has received no objections to the assessment. We do not expect to <br />receive any written objections to the assessment, since the property being assessed is all <br />controlled by developers who are currently in the process of developing the various areas. <br />Attached is a map showing the area contained within the assessment district and also attached <br />is a resolution which the City Council may consider after the assessment hearing. We <br />understand that action will likely be delayed on this resolution until your meeting on <br />August 29 to allow time to analyze the deferral situation. <br /> <br />We will be prepared with a brief presentation and will be available to answer any questions. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />MSA, CONSULTING ENGINEERS <br /> <br /> <br />T~~ <br /> <br />TJM:tW/21S-1804.aug <br />Enclosures <br />