My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.6. SR 08-01-1994
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1994
>
08/01/1994
>
5.6. SR 08-01-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:51 AM
Creation date
4/19/2007 8:57:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/1/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />Regarding $3,800 in the east part of our community, information is too <br />preliminary at this time to know whether or not this figure will be sufficient. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The focus of the Council's discussion on this topic relates to the northeast <br />area of the City. The City began applying this $3,800 amount to the <br />northeast area somewhere around 1991-92. This figure was based on our <br />experience in the northwest area and in the west area. This figure was also <br />based on information in the 1991 and 1992 area-wide study for the northeast <br />area. As the Council may recall, we were having discussions about the need <br />and financing of a water tower in this vicinity at that time. The cost of just <br />the sewer system, water system with the booster station and pressure <br />reducing valves, was estimated at $3,500 per acre. This was well before any <br />commercial project or sewer project between Hillside and the existing trunk <br />sewer line was ordered. The City used the $3,800 amount for Hillside I and <br />II and for CherryHill Bluffs in order to be consistent and uniform on a city- <br />wide basis and due to the uncertainty as to when the project would happen, <br />and the actual costs for the improvements. This was deemed to be an <br />appropriate amount to "buy into" the urban system and to finance the <br />necessary improvements. The Council should note that this $3,800 amount <br />was paid for the CherryHill Bluffs subdivision to flow into an existing sewer <br />pipe where no additional construction costs were incurred. This was simply <br />the price for CherryHill Bluffs to buy into the urban system and develop in <br />an urban manner and this was consistent throughout the City at that time. <br /> <br />My previous memo outlines some of the thoughts on this issue, and staff <br />continues to believe that $3,800 on a city-wide basis is appropriate. We do <br />not dispute that the actual cost in the northeast area may be slightly lower, <br />but how much lower is debatable based on the unknown total costs, lateral <br />benefits, total assessment area, and when actual payment of Green Acre <br />properties will be received. It is clear that the benefit to developers exceeds <br />$3,800 per acre for the right to hook up to the urban system and develop in <br />an urban manner. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.