My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7. SR 07-25-1994
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1994
>
07/25/1994
>
7. SR 07-25-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:51 AM
Creation date
4/16/2007 9:01:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
7/25/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />SANDPIPER ESTATES PETITION <br /> <br />Residents of the Sandpiper Estates feel strongly that we <br />have been involved in a comedy of errors, through no fault of our <br />own. Because of these errors, we are being asked to shoulder an <br />unreasonable and unacceptable financial burden. We simply can <br />not afford to shoulder these costs on our own. For some families <br />the assessment and hook-up charges may simply force them to walk <br />away from their homes. For others, it will mean postponing much <br />needed home improvements indefinitely as well as lowering the <br />quality of living because of the high cost of monthly assessment <br />charges. <br /> <br />We are a development made up primarily of families with <br />young children. We chose this development because it offered <br />economical housing in a rural setting. For many families, these <br />are first homes. We desperately need the city's help in the form <br />of a compromise in our proposed assessments. <br /> <br />The following list was made up by the residents of our <br />development. We feel that this compromise would allow the city <br />to move forward with their plans for the future, but at the same <br />time, not unduly burden the homeowners of our development. <br /> <br />1. The city would not be proposing to run the trunk line through <br />our development at this time if it were not for the urgent need <br />on the part of the Sherburne County Government Center for water <br />and sewer utilities, we are asking that the residents of <br />Sandpiper Estates not be charged the cost of this trunk line. <br /> <br />2. Since Sandpiper Estates soil has fast percolation rates, and <br />all lots are one acre in size, the city should drop the idea of <br />installing Storm Sewers in this development. <br /> <br />3. All sewer and wells in Sandpiper Estates are less than four <br />years old. The city shall reimburse all homeowners on an <br />individual basis for the cost of the unused portions of their <br />systems based on a life expectancy of twenty years. <br /> <br />4. All sewer systems in this development shall have to be <br />abandoned. The city shall pay for the cost of abandonment. <br /> <br />5. All lots in Sandpiper Estates are basically one acre, <br />therefore all assessment amounts should be based on front footage <br />only. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.