Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mastley, Variance <br />June 28, 1994 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />.~' . DIMENSIONAL REGULATIONS <br /> <br />The property is zoned Al which requires a minimum lot size of 10 acres and <br />300 feet of frontage. <br /> <br />As shown on the attached site plan, the gross acreage of both parcels are 10 <br />acres in size however, a portion of the 10 acres is within the right of way of <br />213th Avenue and Jarvis Street. According to the zoning ordinance, when <br />calculating minimum lot area, right of way is not included. The actual lot <br />area of each parcel falls short by one-half acre and one and one-quarter acres, <br />respectively. Each lot does exceed the minimum width requirement of 300 <br />feet. <br /> <br />ANALYSIS <br /> <br />The applicant recently platted Trott Brook Estates into four parcels. This <br />subdivision involves a 40 acre tract immediately west of the subject site. Mr. <br />Mastley received similar variances for each of those four lots. This current <br />proposal is very similar to the Trott Brook Estates variance and <br />administrative subdivision. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The proposed variance lies within the Al zoning district which requires a 10 <br />acre minimum lot size. The intent of the Al district was to allow 4 units per <br />40 acres. This proposal would remain consistent with the 4 per 40 rule. The <br />lot size would also be consistent with other lots in the area, therefore, the <br />variance would not be detrimental to the surrounding property values and <br />would be keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />Staff recommends approval of the lot area variance by Jeff Mastley, based on <br />the following findings. <br /> <br />1. THE INTENT OF THE MINIMUM LOT STANDARDS SET <br />FORTH IN THE Al ZONING DISTRICT IS TO ALLOW <br />LARGE LOT, 10 ACRE SUBDIVISIONS WITH A DENSITY <br />OF 4 UNITS PER 40 ACRES. LITERAL ENFORCEMENT <br />OF THE LOT AREA REQUIREMENTS IN THIS <br />PARTICULAR CASE WOULD GO BEYOND THE INTENT <br />OF THE ORDINANCE. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />LITERAL APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE WOULD <br />DEPRIVE THE APPLICANT FULL USE OF THE <br /> <br />mastley.pc <br />