My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. SR 03-12-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2007
>
03/12/2007
>
5.2. SR 03-12-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 1:36:59 PM
Creation date
3/9/2007 9:15:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
3/12/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Downtown Redevelopment Plan Taskforce rvIinutes <br />December 4, 2006 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />. The "core" commercial/retail areas (both the north and south sides of Hwy 10) <br />. Adjacent single family neighborhoods <br />. Critical recreational amenities (river, Lions Park, Handke) <br />. A connection to Hwy 169 <br /> <br />Member Niziolek inquired about how the Houlton farm fits within the boundary and <br />mentioned that adding more riverfront property to the boundary will improve the <br />marketability of future redevelopment in the area. <br /> <br />Member Rymanowski stated concern that the boundary is too large. Member Lindberg <br />concurred and asked that the single family neighborhoods be removed from the <br />redevelopment area. Staff responded that including the housing stock will better allow for <br />the restoration and rehabilitation of those neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Members Tveite, Urista, Toth and Lieser stated that they prefer the boundary as presented <br />because it incorporates the "greater downtown area" which allows a global and <br />comprehensive perspective to this project. <br /> <br />Member Lieser asked if more homes could be added within the boundary at a later date and <br />staff responded "yes." <br /> <br />Member Wilson added that the current boundary includes components important to the <br />taskforce as a whole. <br /> <br />Member Holme stated that he approves of the boundary as presented because the "core" <br />downtown area affects the "greater do\Vtltown area." <br /> <br />Member Lindberg restated that the single family neighborhoods should be removed from <br />the redevelopment area boundary. Member Wilson responded that it will be healthier to <br />include the homes. <br /> <br />Member Anderson added that he is in favor of natural buffers within the redevelopment <br />plan. <br /> <br />4. Elements of a Redevelopment Plan and How It Will Be Used <br />Director of Economic Development Catherine Mehelich reviewed the following elements of <br />a typical redevelopment plan. These elements will be incorporated into the taskforce's ftnal <br />plan. <br />. Vision <br />. Policies <br />o Land Use <br />o Rehabilitation <br />o Market <br />o Transportation <br />o Design & Regulatory <br />o Property Acquisition <br />o Redevelopment and Land Use <br />o Economic Development <br />. Specific Area Recommendations <br />. Implementation Priorities <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.