My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. SR 03-12-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2007
>
03/12/2007
>
5.2. SR 03-12-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 1:36:59 PM
Creation date
3/9/2007 9:15:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
3/12/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Downtown Redevelopment Plan Taskforce :Minutes <br />December 4, 2006 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Dynamics of Change <br />Scott Clark presented information regarding how Elk River has changed over the years. He <br />presented a commercial radius map, which visually indicated downtown's size in relationship <br />to the size of the commercial areas along Hwy 169. Mr. Clark and the taskforce discussed <br />that Hwy 10 downtown used to be Elk River's main commercial area but now Elk River's <br />main commercial area is along Hwy 169. Mr. Clark also discussed the competitive <br />advantages that Ramsey and Otsego may have over Elk River. <br /> <br />Member Holme commented that he is concerned about "tying" downtown north of Hwy 10 <br />together with downtown south of Hwy 10 due to the physical and safety constraints to cross <br />Hwy 10. He also mentioned his concern that there is no grocery store downtown. <br /> <br />Member T oth added that downtown does not mean much to newer Elk River residents, who <br />are a large portion of Elk River's population and that the taskforce needs to figure out how <br />to get those newer residents downtown. Member Toth also agreed with member Holme <br />that there needs to be a grocery store downtown. <br /> <br />Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) Analysis <br />The taskforce broke into four small groups and completed a SWOT analysis. The results of <br />the analysis are attached to these minutes. <br /> <br />Question/Answer Session <br />After the SWOT was completed, the taskforce answered the following question: Is the <br />former/current model of downtown still viable? Why or why not? Twelve taskforce <br />members answered "no" and one member was unsure. Additional comments are attached <br />to these minutes. <br /> <br />6. Next Steps <br />Member Rymanowski asked if future meetings will last three hours. Ms. Kvilvang indicated <br />that members should plan on meeting for three hours but that some meetings may not last <br />that long. She added that a typical redevelopment plan takes twelve meetings to complete <br />rather than the taskforce's estimated eight meetings. She and staff feel that in respect to <br />members'time, eight meetings will allow the plan to be completed before the busy summer <br />season. <br /> <br />7. Final Comments <br />Each taskforce member stated what he/ she thought about the second meeting. Most <br />members indicated that they thought the SWOT analysis and final question were eye <br />opening. <br /> <br />Submitted by, <br /> <br />#d.f~ <br /> <br />Heidi Steinmetz <br />Assistant Director of Economic Development <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.