My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1. PCSR 01-09-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2006-2010
>
2007
>
01-09-2007
>
5.1. PCSR 01-09-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2008 4:04:05 PM
Creation date
2/13/2007 11:18:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
1/9/2007
case
CU 06-27
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />Elk River Comprehensive Plan, nothing above was said about putting commercial <br />development in residential neighborhoods (within 150ft on all sides). What has happened is, <br />the Planning and Development Commission has ignored our Planning Report and is sending the <br />City down the wrong direction. Or is the City Planners exempt from their own planning report? <br />They are obviously cutting corners in order to make things work for the developer. <br /> <br />Aldi's has another chain of stores called Trader Joe's which sells the higher quality foods which are more <br />expensive., They know the difference does the City? Our images is discount everything place! See <br />Comprehensive Planning report, that not the direction desired. During the Planning Commission meeting <br />December 12, 2006, Jon Hempeheiterated that "Aldi's did an extensive marketing research report, that was <br />5 inches thick". This remark indicates to me that Elk River's "IMAGE" is a discount store, tattoos shop and <br />Landry mat type of place.... whaaat???? Maybe this is what the Mayor whated? I hope Not! Here is another <br />thought, below the the Elk River Comprehensive Planning Report states on Page 112 under "The future of <br />Elk River" (revised on December of 2004): <br /> <br />Image Issues <br />Various elements combine to form community image. In using the Comprehensive Plan as a tool to <br />enhance image, it is important to consider the issues that shape Elk River's image. <br />The following questions help to frame planning related to image: <br />. What factors establish Elk River's identity? <br />. Should and/or how can the image of Elk River be improved in the minds of residents and non-residents? <br />. How can the sense of "place" be enhanced? <br />. Should neighborhoods be more clearly defined and identified? <br />. How can the entrances (or gateways) to Elk River be more clearly identified? <br />. Do the City, the business community, and School District market themselves effectively to existing and <br />prospective residents (especially families)? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Subd. 6. Appeals and adjustments. Appeals to the board of appeals and adjustments may <br />be taken by any affected person upon compliance with any reasonable conditions imposed by <br />the zoning ordinance. The board of appeals and adjustments has the following powers with <br />respect to the zoning ordinance: <br />(1) To hear and decide appeals where it is alleged that there is an error in any order, <br />requirement, decision, or determination made by an administrative officer in the enforcement of <br />the zoning ordinance. <br />(2) To hear requests for variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances <br />where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the <br />individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is demonstrated <br />that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as <br />used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a <br />reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner <br />is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if <br />granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the <br />property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited <br />to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for <br />earth sheltered construction as defined in section 2l6C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with <br />the ordinance. The board of appeals and adjustments or the governing body as the case may be, <br />may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under the ordinance for property in <br />the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or governing body as the case <br />may be, may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one family dwelling as a two family <br />dwelling. The board or governing body as the case may be may impose conditions in the granting <br />of variances to insure compliance and to protect adjacent properties. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Zoning Officer Appeals <br />Local police do not enforce zoning ordinances. Instead, each city has a designated zoning <br />administrator for enforcement, frequently part of a city's building code enforcement function. <br /> <br />Therefore, a property owner cited for a zoning ordinance violation, e.g., operating a business in a <br />residentially zoned area or building a loading dock too close to a street, can appeal to a BOARD <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.