My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-2006 CC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
11-13-2006 CC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:42 AM
Creation date
12/1/2006 8:37:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
11/13/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Minutes <br />November 13, 2006 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Farber wished to discuss an adjustment in pay for the Community <br />Development Director. He stated that this would be effective January 1, 2007 with an <br />increase again in July. City Administrator Lori J ohoson stated that Mr. Clark would receive a <br />step increase on January 1, 2007 and a step increase on July 1, 2007. He would move to the <br />top step on July 1, 2008. Acting Mayor Farber feels that this would be appropriate action. <br />Councilmember Dietz stated that he agrees that Mr. Clark is doing an excellent job and that <br />his pay should be adjusted. Councilmember Gumphrey agreed. Councilmember Motin <br />inquired as to when this would place Mr. Clark at the top of the range, and he was satisfied <br />that this would place him there one year early. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ AND SECONDED BY <br />COUNCILMEMBER GUMPHREY TO APPROVE THE REVISED PAY <br />PLAN FOR SCOTT CLARK AS STATED BY THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR. <br />MOTION CARRIED 4-0. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dietz stated that with his leaving the Council, there will be the need to <br />appoint a council member representative to the Utilities Commission. Normally this person <br />is not on the EDA Commission. He stated that he hoped the Council will continue to <br />appoint this position; that a strong City influence is necessary on that Commission; and <br />stressed the importance to have a council member remain with this Commission. <br /> <br />5.2. Public Works Master Plan Update <br /> <br />Jeff Oertel with Oertel Architects addressed the issues of location, existing facilities, site <br />constraints, site expansion possibilities, future needs and recommendations for future <br />expansion of the City's Public Works Facility. He stated that the existing building, including <br />the second floor space, is approximately 20,000 square feet and the cold storage building is <br />about 7,800 square feet in size. In order to accommodate the parking of all vehicles and <br />equipment under heated cover, to provide an office, and an operation that is ADA <br />compliant, efficient and serviceable, the projection for a current optimum building area <br />would be 86,000 square feet. He stated that if projected out 20-30 years it was anticipated <br />that the facility may need to increase to an overall size of 112,000 to 122,000 square feet. He <br />stated that this was important for no other reason than to determine if the existing site can <br />accommodate the long-term size and site space needs for the Public Works Department. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dietz felt that we should stay at the current site and inquired if we were to <br />expand into the ball fields area, would the City be able to replace these ball fields. <br />Recreational Director Maertz stated that the ball fields would need to be replaced because <br />they are in constant use and that there were some potential sites, however, that there would <br />be a loss of revenue to replace the fields. Councilmember Dietz felt that the Council <br />should step up and build the new facility for the Public Works Department. Councilmember <br />Farber agreed and asked how this would be phased in. <br /> <br />Mr. Oertel explained that this would be a complicated issue since the Public Works <br />Department does not stop operating. It would be eight months of pain during this project. <br />He stated that they would need to expand to the south and west and the office would be at <br />the front point with the crews remaining and working at the current area. The vehicle <br />storage area would be the easiest to expand but would have the greatest need after the office <br />area was completed. He stated that he could share this information at another council <br />meeting explaining Phases I through IV. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.