Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Citv and Facilitv Comparison: <br /> <br />An important part of this initial study and <br />report is to compare the city of Elk River <br />to other cities that have recently <br />completed, or started construction on their <br />facilities. <br /> <br />Oertel Architects has completed dozen's <br />of studies and designed public works <br />buildings for cities all around the metro <br />area. We selected five cities that have key <br />similarities to the city of Elk River. We <br />will review two components for each city <br />and facility for comparison to Elk River, <br />to better understand the size and scope of <br />the facility and department size required to <br />service the city properly. <br /> <br />The first component that will be reviewed <br />is city size. The size of each city will be <br />further broken down by population, future <br />population growth, land area and lane <br />miles the city is responsible for. The <br />second component is public works <br />department size and function. <br />Subcategories that will be reviewed under <br />this component are lane miles and facility <br />size. The five cities reviewed in this <br />section are Minnetonka, Shakopee, <br />Woodbury, Faribault and Otsego. <br /> <br />Minnetonka was chosen because it is a <br />suburb that has reached the near limits in <br />land growth and population size. It has a <br />large, highly demanding population, with <br />many sub-communities. Its previous <br />facility is similar to Elk River's and the <br />site restrictions were similar with a main <br />city park and Minnehaha Creek and its <br />wetlands surrounding the site on three <br />sides. This facility represents an ultimate <br />sized facility. <br /> <br />Shakopee is the second city that will be <br />reviewed. Shakopee, though smaller, is <br /> <br />probably most similar to Elk River. It is a <br />river city with a rich history. It is a third <br />ring suburb with a large portion of <br />undeveloped land, but increasing <br />residential development. Though its <br />previous facility is also similar to Elk <br />River's, the new facility is located on a <br />new site near the city hall, and fire station, <br />creating a civic service area in the city. <br />This facility represents an immediate <br />planned expansion. <br /> <br />Woodbury, as the third city considered, is <br />essentially the ultimate of what Elk River <br />could become. Woodbury started with a <br />small facility that moved to a decent sized <br />facility, expanded recently with another <br />planned expansion in the next five years. <br />The commercial and residential <br />development is growing at a rate that <br />appears to be similar to planned growth in <br />Elk River. This facility represents <br />multiple planned expansions during the <br />facilities life span. <br /> <br />The fourth city that will be reviewed is <br />Otsego. The main reason that Otsego will <br />be reviewed is because of proximity to Elk <br />River. However, Otsego is a facility that <br />is being planned as a phased building on a <br />large site. That way as the city grows the <br />facility can be expanded easily on the <br />same site. <br /> <br />The fifth city to be reviewed in this section <br />is Faribault. Though Faribault is not in the <br />metro area, there are two factors of the <br />facility and department are similar to Elk <br />River. They are population and lane <br />miles. Overall size of the city may not be <br />the same, but similar growth rates between <br />the cities make it relevant. This facility <br />represents a size that fits current fleet size, <br />and future expansion. <br /> <br />20 <br />