My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.4. SR 11-06-2006
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2006
>
11/06/2006
>
5.4. SR 11-06-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:40 AM
Creation date
11/2/2006 1:39:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/6/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />13 <br /> <br />PROJECT COSTS: <br /> <br />To place this project out for bids would require the use of a consultant. <br />The Edina Police Department had the cheapest rate for a consultant we <br />could find, and that was $30,000. Other related projects in Mille Lacs <br />County, Crow Wing County, Buffalo, Isanti County and others, have <br />incurred consultant fees as high as $145,000. <br /> <br />One way to avoid these costs is to start small and then add on to the <br />system as the funding becomes available through our lease program. <br />We can start the process and avoid bids by purchasing the first section <br />of this new RMS project, the mobile piece, for under $50,000. No <br />formal bid process would be required, thus eliminating the need to hire <br />a consultant and pay the cost to develop a request for proposal and <br />bids. We have the IT staff in-house that could assist with that process, <br />but a consultant would still be needed to draft the required documents <br />for the requests. Edina's RFP was almost 175 pages in length. <br /> <br />We have examined the other vendors who are available, as well as <br />looking at our current software provider as potential options instead of <br />LETG. None of these are viable solutions, and our IT staff strongly <br />advocated the LETG solution for ease in long term maintenance, ability <br />to implement future change, and the browser based solution provided <br />as the primary means on interface. In addition, LETG is the only <br />solution that is working with the State to accomplish the DVS and <br />MNCIS interfaces. Our IT manager Bob Pearson has thrown his total <br />support into the LETG project, and has been a strong advocate for <br />migration to a solution that offers this much efficiency and enhanced <br />performance. <br /> <br />If approved, we would work the vendor on lease options, and would <br />structure a payment program that would be cost effective for the next <br />5-7 years. See the attached spread sheet for exact details. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.