Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~- <br /> <br />e: <br /> <br />MSJ~ <br /> <br />CD.\Sl!LTL\G E\Gt\EEllS <br /> <br />CIVil ENGINEERING: <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAl <br /> <br />MUNICIPAl <br /> <br />PLANNING <br /> <br />STRUCTURAl <br /> <br /> <br />. SURVEYING <br /> <br />TRAFFIC <br /> <br />TRANSPORTATION <br /> <br />1326 Energy Pork Drive <br />SI. Paul, MN 55108 <br />612-644'4389 <br /> <br />Fox: 612-644-9446 <br /> <br />fill 9800 Shelord Parkway <br />Minneapolis, MN 55441 <br />612-546-0432 <br />Fox: 612-544-6398 <br /> <br />May 19,1994 <br />File: 230-221-11 <br /> <br />Mr. Steve Ach <br />City Planner <br />City of Elk River <br />13065 Orono Parkway <br />Elk River, MN 55330 <br /> <br />RE: DARKENW ALD PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Ach: <br /> <br />We have previously reviewed the proposed Automall, Mr. Movies, Little Caesar's Pizza <br />proposed development on the Darkenwald property and commented in a letter dated April 15, <br />1994. At that time, we recommended that a traffic study be done to analyze the effects of this <br />proposed development on the intersection of Carson Street and Main Street. The developers <br />have had a traffic study prepared for this proposed development by Benshoof and Associates. <br />We have reviewed the traffic study and would offer the following comments: <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />The traffic study analyzed two different alternatives for road alignment, one with a right- <br />in/right-out at the north end of Carson Street on TH 169 and the second without a right- <br />in/right-out access point. We have had recent discussions with MnDOT regarding the <br />TH 169 corridor relative to additional access points. MnDOT has informally proposed <br />that a corridor study be prepared for TH 169 from the intersection of TH 101 to the <br />north City limits. This corridor study would be a joint effort between MnDOT and the <br />City and would take approximately 18 months to complete. MnDOT has indicated they <br />would make no decisions on additional requests for access points until such a study was <br />completed. Therefore, we believe it is best to analyze this development as if a right- <br />in/right-out access on TH 169 will not be granted. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />The traffic study indicates that the proposed development will generate approximately <br />160 trips in the p.m. peak hour leaving the site. In order to accommodate this increase <br />in trips, the traffic study proposes improvements consisting of the widening of Carson <br />Street to accommodate a right turn lane at Main Street and to add a 2-foot wide striped <br />island between north and southbound traffic. This would result in a street width of 42 <br />feet. The current street is 30 feet wide. We concur with this recommendation and <br />would add that the right turn lane should be a minimum of 300 feet long plus a taper <br />section. We believe it needs to be long enough to accommodate several right turning <br />vehicles and also to preclude left turning vehicles from lining up and blocking access to <br />the right turn lane. <br />