My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-09-2006 CC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
10-09-2006 CC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:39 AM
Creation date
10/19/2006 3:06:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
10/9/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Minutes <br />October 2, 2006 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />explained that Phase 1, which consisted of headwork improvements project to resolve a <br />hydraulic bottleneck at the plant, was almost completed. He explained that a four step <br />program had been laid out and gave some of the project background. <br /> <br />Mr. Chang and Mr. Stewart explained that it was necessary to get the phosphorus level down <br />to 1 mg/1 in year 2007 and to reduce the mercury to 10 ng/1 in year 2008. They explained <br />that Phase 2 would be an advanced treatment upgrade costing $4 million which would <br />include the phosphorous and mercury control, replacement of the 20 year-old UV system, <br />addition of permanent standby generator, a garage expansion for vacuum truck, and other <br />miscellaneous improvements. They also explained Phase 3 and Phase 4 which would not be <br />for several years. <br /> <br />Ms. Johnson stated that there is currently $5.7 million in the sewer fund from sewer <br />connection charges and that this project should be able to be funded through the treatment <br />funds. <br /> <br />Mr. Maurer stated that he will be working with Finance and Community Development <br />regarding SAC charges, the possibility of raising them and to what extent. <br /> <br />It was stated that the cost of Phase 3 and Phase 4 would be growth dependent and the need <br />would become apparent when the gravel mining area is opened up. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER FARBER AND SECONDED BY <br />COUNCILMEMBER GUMPHREY TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 06-118 <br />ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR <br />THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PHASE 2 IMPROVEMENTS OF <br />2006. MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOTIN AND SECONDED BY <br />COUNCILMEMBMER FARBER TO AUTHORIZE STAFF TO RESTART <br />CONVERSATIONS WITH GREAT RIVER ENERGY FOR LAND <br />ACQUISITION. MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />5.5. Gas Station Ordinance <br /> <br />Counci1member Morin had requested that discussion take place regarding an ordinance <br />requiring alternative fuels at city gas stations. He stated that we talk about being an energy <br />city, so he wanted to know if the Council wished to look at this. <br /> <br />Mayor Klinzing asked if the ordinance would require every station to offer E85. <br /> <br />Counci1member Motin stated that he feels every new station or expansion could be pursuing <br />this. <br /> <br />Counci1member Farber agrees and felt that tlle City should take the lead on this issue. <br /> <br />Ms. Johnson stated that currently no other city could be found that is doing this, but the <br />state has grants to promote production issues. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the council to send this item to the Energy City Commission and <br />have them look at the possibility. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.