Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-..\) <br /> <br />James Rossman, CUP <br />1\1arch 22, 1994 <br /> <br />~\\ <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />building permit being issued. The Planning Commission is asked to review <br />the overall concept of the zero lot line for a shared drive. The site plan <br />information is included with the zero lot line application to show the <br />Commission how the shared drive will tie in with the overall development of <br />this site. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />SHARED ACCESS <br /> <br />Originally, the applicant proposed separate curb cuts for each building <br />however, staff and the applicant came to the consensus that a shared access <br />could serve both sites effectively while increasing traffic safety. <br /> <br />As stated earlier, the applicant is proposing a 24 foot wide shared driveway <br />which would bisect and service the existing mortgage building plus the <br />proposed office building. The applicant and staff have worked together to <br />achieve a layout for both parcels which would provide efficient development <br />of each site. <br /> <br />CROSS EASEMENT AGREEMENT <br /> <br />If this proposal is approved, staff would recommend a cross easement e <br />agreement be entered into for shared access of the driveway. Although, at <br />.this time, both parcels are owned by the same individual, a cross easement <br />agreement is needed to ensure that future property owners are protected. <br /> <br />RECOMJ\ffiNDATION <br /> <br />Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit request for a zero <br />lot line shared driveway based on the seven criteria for granting a conditional <br />use permit with the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. THE APPLIC.WT PROVIDE THE CITY 'WITH PROOF OF <br />RECORDING OF A CROSS EASE1\1ENT AGREEME:NT BETWEEN <br />THE TV,TO P AR~ELS. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />pcjr.doc <br />