Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Joint City Council/Park & Recreation Commission <br />April 12, 1993 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />-------------- <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />City begins <br />this park <br />possibility <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />to layout <br />area. <br />of sharing <br /> <br />its entrance and driveway and parking lot <br />A brief discussion took place regarding <br />an entrance into the Golf Course and park. <br /> <br />into <br />the <br /> <br />The City Administrator <br />Course in order to <br />plans. <br /> <br />was directed to make contact with the Golf <br />obtain information on the Golf Course expansion <br /> <br />8. Update on ISTEA Grant Application <br /> <br />The City Administrator briefly reviewed the ISTEA Grant application as <br />prepared by Phil Hals, Street/Park Superintendent. It was noted that- <br />this application is an elaboration of the previously submitted LAWCON <br />Grant for improvements of the railroad trail. The City Council has <br />approved the submission of this grant. It was noted that the match <br />requirement of the City does not have to be entirely in cash and that <br />the City's match requirement is projected to be 34% of the total <br />project. <br /> <br />Both the <br />tremendous <br />successful <br />years. <br /> <br />Commission and the Council agreed that this would be a <br />benefit to the community if the grant application was <br />and. if the improvements could take place in the next couple <br /> <br />9. <br /> <br />Park Dedication Fees and Land Requirement Formula <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />The Park & Rec Commission Chair, Dave Anderson, indicated that the <br />Commission reviewed this issue at its 4/7/93 meeting. The Co~~ission <br />recommended the adoption of a policy as outlined by the City <br />Administrator in his 4/1/93 memo to the Park & Rec Commission. This <br />formula was based on a 10% land dedication requirement. The formula <br />applied is that if the City is requesting less than 10% land <br />dedication, then the park fee dedication requirement would be reduced <br />according to the percent reduction in land being required. <br /> <br />EXAMPLE: <br />If a plat of 40 acres has a land dedication requirement of 4 <br />(10%), but the City only desires only 2 acres (50% of the maximum <br />requirement); then the $400 per lot cash contribution requirement <br />be reduced by 50% or to $200 per lot. <br /> <br />acres <br />land <br />would <br /> <br />The City Council <br />the cases when <br />developer. <br /> <br />concurred with this policy <br />the City obtains part <br /> <br />as <br />land <br /> <br />being appropriate for <br />and part cash from the <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN MOVED TO ACCEPT THE LAND AND CASH DEDICATION <br />REQUIREMENT FORMULA AND DIRECTED STAFF TO PREPARE THE NECESSARY CODE <br />AMENDMENTS TO IMPLEMENT THIS FORMULA. COUNCILMEMBER FARBER SECONDED <br />THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />Councilmember Scheel expressed her frustration with the City obtaining <br />Park Dedication Fees from only developers and landowners where a <br />subdivision takes place. She indicated that she believed other <br /> <br />e <br />