Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council :Minutes <br />July 24, 2006 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />the public and to properly represent the city. Chief Beahen emphasized that simply putting <br />additional downtown signage is not the answer as to date, the police department has <br />experienced almost zero-compliance on traffic signage downtown. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Gumphrey questioned if downtown traffic control would be necessary if <br />Main Street remained closed until October 1. Chief Beahen stated that it would depend on <br />the construction traffic patterns. He noted that the traffic patterns downtown change daily <br />and that he had not originally anticipated having to have an officer downtown daily for <br />traffic control. <br /> <br />Chief Beahen commended the contractors for adhering to their approved staging areas and <br />keeping construction traffic off of Main Street. He noted that he has witnessed some of the <br />construction delays put upon these projects and many of them were beyond the contractor's <br />control. <br /> <br />Councilmember Gumphrey questioned given the unforeseen delays, what the contractors <br />are doing to expedite the completion of their projects. <br /> <br />Adam Holmes of VanMan Architects and Builders for the Bank of Elk River Project; Paul <br />Lyver representing CSS Builders on the Bluff Block Project; and Ken Hinz of Flannery <br />Construction for the Jackson Block project were present and provided input on their <br />construction schedules. <br /> <br />Mayor Klinzing stated that she is not interested in extending the August 11 deadline as the <br />Council promised the downtown business owners that it would be reopened by that date. <br />She questioned why the city is providing police officers for traffic control and why the <br />contractors are not providing the traffic control. Chief Beahen stated that normally traffic <br />control provisions are included as part of a development agreement but no such provisions <br />were included into these development agreements. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Marcy VanValkenburg, Elk River Travel and Keith Holme, Kemper Drug property <br />owner - stated that their businesses are hurting due to the Main Street closure and that they <br />would rather have it reopened as soon as possible even if it has to be closed periodically <br />throughout the day to allow construction traffic to pass. <br /> <br />Fred McCoy, McCoy's Pub - stated that he would like Main Street to be opened but has <br />concerns that people may get upset at the condition of the road and be reluctant to travel <br />Main Street in the future. <br /> <br />Karen Attia, Olde Main Eatery - indicated that it is ridiculous to assume that the <br />contractors will remain on schedule if the deadline is extended to October 1. <br /> <br />Councilmember Motin indicated that he agrees with Mr. McCoy. He would like for Main <br />Street to reopen as soon as possible but that he would rather err on the side of public safety <br />and doesn't believe reopening it is the best thing to do. He stated that he has concerns about <br />the road reopening in poor condition and with people traveling so closely though <br />construction zones. He noted that if the downtown businesses can be legally compensated <br />he would be interested in looking into that. <br /> <br />Fire Chief Bruce West explained that it will take the cooperation of all three contractors and <br />the public to ensure that public safety remains the number one concern downtown when <br />Main Street is reopened and throughout all of the downtown construction. <br /> <br />. <br />