My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-10-2006 CC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
07-10-2006 CC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:31 AM
Creation date
8/8/2006 4:50:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
7/10/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Minutes <br />July 10, 2006 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />6.8. <br /> <br />YMCA Update and Ballot Question Language Review <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />City Administrator Lori Johnson reviewed with Council the funding proposal for the <br />YMCA. The voters would be asked if they want the city to pay two-thirds of the <br />construction of a YMCA. If approved, the City will issue general obligation bonds to fund <br />the entire project. The YMCA will fund one third of the annual debt service on the bonds. <br />The City will be the owner of the building and the YMCA and City will enter into an <br />agreement defining the arrangement whereby the YMCA will operate programs out of the <br />facility. <br /> <br />One of the items to be decided is the amount that will be included in the bond question for <br />the construction of the facility. The question will include financing for the entire project, <br />even though the YMCA will repay one third of the debt service over the life of the bonds. <br />The YMCA is estimating construction costs to be $12 million. The $12 million excludes the <br />cost of energy efficiency improvements and the additional cost to use recycled products. <br />The City would pay $8 million of the $12 million plus the energy efficiency and recycle cost. <br />These additional costs may be eligible for the County's Landfill Abatement Public Building <br />Grant that is being considered by the County Board on July 11. <br /> <br />Since the City has had concerns with the draft memorandum of understanding, it was agreed <br />that it is in the best interest of all parties to ensure that an agreement complies with state law. <br />To alleviate the Y's concern that the City's legal advice may be too conservative, it was <br />agreed that the City and the YMCA will put together an outline of the proposed agreement <br />and submit it to Kennedy and Graven for an independent review and analysis of the legality <br />of the proposed agreement. Attorney Beck reviewed the outline of the proposed agreement <br />asking for council input. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the council to put the following into the agreement that will be <br />submitted to Kennedy and Graven for their review and analysis. <br />1. Form and term of agreement - to call it a management contract explaining the reasons. <br />2. Term and termination - can be terminated for lack of pcryment; the period of time for cancellation <br />after initial term is 6 years. <br />3. How much would the YMCA get back if the city terminates the agreement prior to 30 <br />years - 100% to Year 25; thereafter 50% up to Year 30; and zero after 30years. <br />4. How much would the YMCA get back if the YMCA terminates the agreement prior to. <br />30 years - nothing. <br />5. Need to consider - what penalties for early default during the initial term? <br />6. City control over design, construction and operation - Council wished to ask Kennecfy & <br />Graven if thry can delegate the design, construction, and operation of this facility to the Yl\1 C4 and/ or <br />have a five member commission consisting of three council members and two representatives from the Y <br />who would make discretionalfy decisions but recogniifng that the Y has been doing this for years. <br />7. What level of oversight to ensure the facility is properly maintained - Commission meets for <br />capital improvement purpose and over a certain dollar amount council would have to approve. This <br />monry would have to be from reseroes not tax le1!Y portion of the bond; there would have to be a process <br />with the Y coming to CounciL Need to establish a list separating out capital improvements that affect <br />structure of the building. <br />8. Capital Improvements - Ms. Johnson and the yj attornry will continue to work on this. <br /> <br />The Council revised the proposed ballot language. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.