My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.7. SR 03-21-1994
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1994
>
03/21/1994
>
7.7. SR 03-21-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:29 AM
Creation date
8/3/2006 12:53:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
3/21/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />VARIANCE REQUIREMENTS <br /> <br />Staff refers the Planning Commission to section 900.40 of the Elk River City <br />Code of Ordinance for the five standards to consider when reviewing a <br />variance. It is staffs opinion that hardship can be shown and this request <br />meets the five required standards. The City of Elk River constructed the <br />library and parking area at the time when each setback would have met City <br />code. The need for a variance is not the result of the applicant but through <br />changes to the City Zoning Ordinance. By allowing the variance, it will not <br />detrimentally affect the health safety or welfare of the residents of the City. <br />It should also be stressed that both of these variances are for existing <br />conditions not associated with the proposed addition. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />Staff recommends approval of the five (5) foot front yard building setback <br />variance along Proctor Avenue and a five (5) foot parking lot setback variance <br />based on the following findings: <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Literal enforcement of the ordinance would cause unavoidable <br />hardship because of an existing condition which, at the time <br />the building was constructed, met City Code. <br /> <br />2. The variance is not a consequence of the petitioners action but <br />due to changes in City Code. <br /> <br />3. The variance will not be injurious, to, or adversely affect the <br />health, safety, or welfare of the residents of the City or the <br />neighborhood where in the property is situated and will be <br />keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.