My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HANDOUT #1 07-24-2006
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2006
>
07/24/2006 - SPECIAL
>
HANDOUT #1 07-24-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:28 AM
Creation date
7/28/2006 9:22:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />River <br /> <br />Police Department <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />Mayor and City Council <br />Jeffrey A. Beahen, Chief of Police <br /> <br />July 24, 2006 <br /> <br />Downtown Redevelopment Project <br /> <br />There are several issues surrounding the downtown project that directly involve the police <br />department and have created a litany of problems that the Council should be apprised of. <br />My hope in conveying this information is to better inform the Council of some of the <br />factors that have impacted the project as a whole, and what new factors will be impacting the <br />project in the near future. <br /> <br />First, the traffic plan as approved by the Council last October and revisited in May, was an <br />accurate document, at the time it was written and when project schedules were tracking as <br />projected, or were to start on time. Through a variety of issues and complications, outside <br />my control, projects were delayed, started early, or changed in scope, all having dramatic <br />impact on the traffic flow directly related to construction delivery, construction traffic and <br />interrelated business deliveries and customer traffic. We utilized a static traffic control plan, <br />designed for a dynamic construction process, often with unforeseen results. <br /> <br />Second, we all know that signs and adherence to same has been an unforeseen problem with <br />far reaching implications. Starting with the "No-left Turn" on Parrish when this first began, <br />we have been faced with almost zero compliance with traffic control signage. Even today, <br />we still have people traveling the wrong way on Jackson. Last week, a driver drove past all <br />the signs on Proctor, up across piles of gravel, and got hung up on the tracks during the <br />repairs to the crossing. Frankly, if people just obeyed signs, 95% of the issues surrounding <br />the downtown project would simply go away. Yet enforcement, personalized traffic control <br />guidance from the downtown officer, and better than ever signs-still result in the majority <br />not following the traffic control plan at all. I have no answers for compliance, we have tried <br />everything-we just need to be aware that signage is not the solution. <br /> <br />Last, as we move forward to reopening the road for that 4-week period, we need to <br />understand that the staff I supply for this project will increase from 1-officer, 9-hours a day, <br />to 3-officers, 9-hours a day. We estimate that just the one officer will cost the City almost <br />$40,000 through October. Adding the two additional officers will be another $24,300. I am <br />still five officers short, so the remaining officers are filling these details by working overtime, <br />with many staff working 16-hour days. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.