My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.0. SR 02-21-1994
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1994
>
02/21/1994 - SPECIAL
>
3.0. SR 02-21-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:27 AM
Creation date
7/24/2006 2:49:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
2/21/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />SPECIAL \VORKSESSION OF THE ELK RIVER CITY COUNCIL <br />HELD AT THE ELK RIVER CITY HALL - CONFERENCE ROOM A <br />SATURDAY, JANUARY 8, 1994 <br /> <br />Members Present: <br /> <br />Mayor Duitsman, Councilmembers Dietz, Farber and Holmgren <br />(8:40 a.m.) <br /> <br />Members Absent: <br /> <br />Council member Scheel <br /> <br />Staff Present: <br /> <br />Pat Klaers, City Administrator; Terry Maurer, City Engineer; <br />Darrell Mack, WWTS Superintendent; Steve Ach, City Planner; <br />Lori Johnson, Finance Director <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof. the special worksession of the City <br />Council was called to order at 8:05 p.m. by Mayor Duitsman. <br /> <br />By consensus of the City Council, the agenda of the City Council worksession was <br />accepted. It was noted that the Assessment Manual would likely not be <br />discussed at this meeting due to time constraints and also that the Mayor would <br />like to discuss the Menard's proposal. <br /> <br />1. <br />2. <br /> <br />Wastewater Treatment Plant Exoansion <br />East Trunk Hiqhwav 10 Utilities <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The City Engineer distributed his 12/15/93 memo that outlined the survey results of <br />the East Highway 10 property owners regarding their desire for municipal utilities. <br />With the assistance of a colored map that visually showed the results of this utilities <br />survey, the City Engineer reviewed the responses that were received. The City <br />Engineer noted that the results were mixed. <br /> <br />On the map, the City Engineer showed three different potential service districts <br />for the extension of municipal sewer and water. It was noted that if sewer and <br />water is only extended through the Highway 169/10111 0 intersection, then the <br />$3,800 per acre trunk fees would fall approximately $1,000,000 short of financing <br />the project. Additionally, if trunk sewer and water was extended approximately <br />to 171st Avenue, then the $3,800 trunk fee would fall approximately $500,000 short <br />of financing this project. Finally, it was noted that if trunk sewer and water is <br />extended to 165th Avenue, then the $3,800 per acre trunk fee would be sufficient <br />to cover the trunk expenses. It was stated that the $3,800 per acre assessment <br />amount should really be revised and redesignated as a trunk water and sewer <br />and sewer plant impact fee. The City will need to evaluate this terminology <br />change when it reviews the Assessment Manual. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The City Engineer distributed a waste water flow projection for the City of Elk <br />River. It was noted that if total development of the parcels of property currently <br />platted took place before 1998, the wastewater treatment plant would be at <br />capacity. It was noted that this total development is unlikely, but also that utilities <br />may be extended into other areas which would affect the plant capacity. The <br />City will have to closely monitor its capacity at the plant. but it appears that <br />sufficient capacity exists until 1998 unless a significantly larger than anticipated <br />growth spurt takes place in Elk River. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.