Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Case File: 01\ 06-05 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />OptiOl1 C: <br /> <br />No fencing is required for any above-ground pool. A permit is still required if the pool is o,rer 24- <br />inces deep or 5,000 gallons or more. <br /> <br />Controlled access ,vould be required for pools 24-inches or higher and failure to due so would be a <br />misdemeanor which can result in a citation. <br /> <br />The thought is the side\vall of an abo,re-ground pool acts as a barrier. The purpose for a fence is to <br />act as a barrier to pre,rent a baby/toddler or inattenti,re adult from accidentally falling into a pool. <br /> <br />OPTION <br />C <br /> <br /> PERMIT FENCE CONTROLLED <br /> REQUIRED REQUIRED ACCESS <br />g~~l ) \ <br />~) SInE WAll.. t=~ YES YES <br />ACiS AS B.ARJUa <br /> <br />~\ <br /> <br />~(jl <br /> <br />HOLE ABLE TO FALL IN <br /> <br />BARRIER THAT MUST BE cr..n.mED <br /> <br />Planning Commission Action <br /> <br />A resident spoke regarding their desires on \vhat should be included in the ordinance. TIle Planning <br />Conunission discussed the options and concluded that side \valls of an above-ground pool \vould be <br />an adequate barrier to pre\lent accidental entry into the pool. They agreed that they did not want to <br />impose a significant financial impact on a home owner for a temporary pool that is relati:\Tely <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />llleXpenslve. <br /> <br />The Planning Conunission agreed \vith staffs recommendation of Option C with additional <br />language being added regarding tile storage of chemicals in a structure. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />Staff and dle Planning Conunission recommended the City Council approve the proposed language <br />\vhich reflects Option C. <br /> <br />S:\PLA..NNING\Case Files\200G\OA \01\ 06-05 Pool Fences\OA 06-0S_CC.doc <br />