Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Case File: 06-16 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Landsccpina <br /> <br />The proposed expansion will encroach into an existing green space. Several trees will need to be <br />relocated or replaced. The landscaping plan de'veloped by the applicant includes foundation planting <br />around the perimeter of the new addition, installation of walks, a gazebo, and a perennial garden. <br />TIle landscaping plan also shows 8 new e\rergreen trees along the north side of the new parking lot, <br />\vitll 6 more along dle north side of the ne\v addition. With the exception of the parking lot tree <br />islands noted abo've, tlle landscaping plan appears to be consistent with the intent of the Ordinance. <br /> <br />Gradina, Drainaae and Utilities <br /> <br />The plan sho\vs storm \vater catch basins in the courtyard, one near the perennial garden, and 5 <br />along the ne\v dri\re. These \vill feed into the existing detention pond on the east side of the <br />building. A portion of the storm se\ver \vill run under the new addition, which is not recommended <br />by the State Plumbing Code. Staff \vould reconunend that an alternative be pursued. <br /> <br />Standards for Issuance of a Conditional Use Permit (Section 30-654) <br /> <br />Tile issuance of a Conditional Use Permit can be ordered only if the use at the proposed location: <br /> <br />1. lf7ill not endangeJ~ il!Jilre or detriJJ1ental!y affect the use and eJ!jqyJJJent of other property in the iJJJJJJediate <br />vicini(y or the public health, safety, JIJorals, COJlifoJt, convenience or general 2ve!fare of the neighborhood or the <br />czty . <br />The expansion does not appear to negatively impact the surrounding area. <br />2. IJ7ill be consistent lvith the cOJJprehellsive plall. <br />The COlnprehensi\re plan guides the existing use at publici semi-public. The addition does <br />not represent a change from tlle original use. <br />3. If/ill not iJJpede the nOJ7Jial and orderlY develop'Jient and ilJprOVeJJJent of sJI17YJunding lJt1Cant properlY. <br />}\-1ucll of tlle adjacent areas l1a\'e not been de\reloped, therefore, the additional \vill not likely <br />impede furtller de\relopment. In fact, the rein,restment may be a catalyst for rede,\relopment <br />or reinvestment in the area. <br />4. IIril1 be served adequateb' 0' and lvill not adverseb' affect essential public facilities and services inchlding <br />streets, police and fire protection, drainage, refilse disposa~ 2vater and sewer !)lsteJIJS, parks and s"'lJools; and <br />lvillnot, in paJticulal~ create traffic congestion or inteiference with trajjic on acfjacent and neighboring public <br />thoroughfares. <br />Through the revie\v of the proposal, the police, fire, and utility divisions reyie\v the proposal. <br />Their comments or suggested conditions, if follo\ved, \vill serve to address any inadequacies. <br />5. lf7ill 110t involve Jlses, actitJities, processes, JJJaterials, equip/lient and conditions of operation that Jvill be <br />detrillJental to al!)' persons or property because of eo/,,<cessive traffic, noise, slJJoke, fillJJes, glare, odors, dllst or <br />IJib ratio ns. <br />It does not appear tllat tlle noise, traffic, smoke, etc causes negative impacts to tlle <br />surrounding property. <br /> <br />CU 06-16 Guardian Angels e~~ansion <br />