Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />William Smith, AS, V & CUP <br />December 20, 1993 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />THE VARIANCE IS NOT A CONSEQUENCE OF THE PETITIONERS <br />ACTION BUT DUE TO A CHANGE IN CITY CODE. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />WILL NOT BE INJURIOUS TO OR ADVERSELY <br />HEALTH, SAFETY, OR WELFARE OF THE <br />THE CITY OR THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND IS IN <br />THE SPIRIT AND INTENT OF THE ORDINANCE. <br /> <br />THE VARIANCE <br />AFFECT THE <br />RESIDENTS OF <br />KEEPING WITH <br /> <br />Also, the Planning Commission recommended approval of a <br />conditional use permit request for a zero lot line development <br />based on the seven criteria for granting a conditional use <br />permit with the following condition: <br /> <br />1. SITE VERIFICATION BY THE CITY BUILDING INSPECTOR <br />ENSURING BUILDING CODES FOR A ZERO LOT LINE STRUCTURE <br />ARE MET (The City Building Inspector has verified <br />that building codes have been met for a zero lot line <br />structure). <br /> <br />Lastly, staff recommends approval of <br />subdivision with the following condition: <br /> <br />administrative <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />1. PAYMENT OF PARK DEDICATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $400.00 <br />BE PAID TO THE CITY. <br />