My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.0. SR 12-08-1993
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1993
>
12/08/1993
>
3.0. SR 12-08-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:22 AM
Creation date
6/30/2006 2:59:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/8/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The tax increase in the urban district is more typical of what <br />is happening in Elk River because of the three factors noted in <br />the above paragraph. It is unmistakable that taxes are <br />increasing in the city of Elk River due to, in some part, an <br />increase in spending by the city. The city has kept spending <br />down in the last five years due to the levy limits that were <br />placed on the City. During these periods of high growth, our <br />tax rate decreased. In 1994, taxes are proposed to increase <br />due mainly to an increase in personnel. Personnel is roughly <br />two-thirds of the City budget, and, if we are making increases <br />in this area, then generally speaking, expenditures are going <br />up and taxes sometimes will also go up if the increase in our <br />City net tax capacity does not keep pace. The City tax rate is <br />going up at the same rate as the School District and the <br />County. These are the other two government jurisdictions that <br />comprise the local property taxes. <br /> <br />The City has new Truth in Taxation requirements placed upon it <br />in 1994. The new informational requirements relate to City <br />employees. These new requirements are outlined below and <br />indicate what the City must discuss at the Truth in Taxation <br />public hearing. <br /> <br />1 . <br /> <br />The percent of total proposed budget representing <br />total compensation costs for employees (wages, <br />salaries, benefits, etc.); <br /> <br />2. Numbers of employees by general classification, and <br />whether they are full-time or part-time; <br /> <br />3. Budgeted expenditures for and numbers of consultants <br />and other independent contractors; and, <br /> <br />4. The effect of budget increase or decreases on the <br />proposed property tax levy. <br /> <br />At the 12/8/93 Truth in Taxation Budget Public Hearing, the <br />City staff anticipates reviewing the proposed 1994 General Fund <br />budget. Following this review, staff will be prepared to <br />discuss the reasons for the budget increase and the associated <br />tax increase. Following this discussion, staff will review the <br />items listed in the above paragraph in order to be in <br />compliance with the Truth in Taxation requirements. Finally, <br />following the Truth in Taxation requirements, the City staff <br />will then be prepared to respond to questions from the public <br />and the City Council. <br /> <br />At the 12/8/93 Truth in Taxation Public Hearing, as much detail <br />on each individual departmental budget as deemed necessary by <br />the City Council can be provided. The level of detail offered <br />by the staff may depend on the number of citizens in attendance <br />at this meeting. In general, the City Council should be <br />familiar with the proposed 1994 budget document as it has been <br />reviewed with them at worksessions in August and September. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.