My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.0. SR 12-13-1993
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1993
>
12/13/1993
>
3.0. SR 12-13-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:21 AM
Creation date
6/30/2006 2:26:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />(e <br /> <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Elk River Planning Commission Minutes <br />October 28, 1993 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER KREGER MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE PROPOSED TAX INCREMENT <br />FINANCING DISTRICT (DISTRICT NO. 12) APPEARS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ALTHOUGH THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS SOME CONCERNS <br />REGARDING THE DISTRICT. THOSE CONCERNS ARE AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />1. The Planning Commission suggested the Economic Development <br />Coordinator be at the Planning Commission meetings to present <br />proposals associated with that department. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />This tax increment financing assistance for this <br />proposal seems to be exorbitant. <br /> <br />particular <br /> <br />3. What percentage of the project cost is TIF? <br /> <br />4. Page 1, TIF District No. 12 Summary; last paragraph states the TIF <br />District No. 12 will exist for approximately twelve (12) to <br />thirteen (13) years, however, page 5, TIF District No. 12 Plan; <br />item"G.1,"paragraph 1, states the district may be c::aptl,lred by <br />the City for a period of up to eight years. ThePlannirig <br />Commis$ion noted that it is difficult to understand. the length of <br />recapture <br /> <br />~:;:'" - <br /> <br />thep~op6sa,lis . not compatiblewith;the cur':cent' ',' <br />'.j;;,--..: - " ',.,-, ;'?{<O;\/:: <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />Parking in the rear of th~ build,ing shall not encroach upon the <br />river buffer zone. Proposal does not appear to be compatible with <br />future . plans for a "riverfront. j. <br /> <br />7... ':ThEFbuilding should be,J:~q1.1~rEadto meetth~ <br />River ordinance proyisions and other <br />buildings near lakes and rivers. <br /> <br />new Wild, ~Ulcl .. Scenic <br />design standards for <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER EBERLEY SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 7-0. <br /> <br />10. Other Business <br /> <br />Steve Ach briefed the Planning Commission on the proposed Business Park <br />Zoning District, as per the memo from Bill Rubin, Economic Development <br />Coordinator. The purpose of the memo is to inform the Planning <br />Commission of a future business park and to consider an ordinance <br />regulating business parks. Staff asked the Planning Commission to <br />accept this draft ordinance and begin reviewing for further discussion <br />at a future workshop meeting. <br /> <br />Chairman Minton asked Steve Ach if progress is being made regarding the <br />Comprehensive Plan. Steve Ach replied that he is almost ready to <br />present the Planning Commission with a preliminary draft of a schedule <br />to update the plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.