Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, . <br /> <br />e 20-0W A: <br />The lithologic log for this boring is of very poor quality. It is interpreted as SW from <br />a depth of 40 feet to the base although grain size distribution information conflicts with <br />this suggesting a till unit. <br /> <br /> <br />34-0W A: <br />On Figure 9F the SM d~posit is interpreted as outwash. Grain-size information suggests <br />that it is comprised of 45% silt and would be classified as till according to the criteria <br />established in the Field Procedures Report. <br /> <br />17-0WA: <br />The till unit begins at a considerably higher elevation than is shown on Figure 91 based <br />upon the log, grain size information and the association with 26-0WA. <br /> <br />26-0W A: <br />The till unit should occur at an elevation near to the surface, based upon the boring log <br />and hydraulic conductivity data for the well. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />103-0WA: <br />Interpretation of the upper till unit does not match between Figures 9E and 9L. The' <br />lower till interpretation also shows a minor discrepancy of several feet. <br /> <br />106-0WA: <br />According to the boring log and well construction diagram, this boring is only 70 feet <br />deep. The interpretations for this boring must be shifted to. match the boring log and <br />reflect a depth of 70 feet. The ground elevation may also be in error by approximately <br />1.7 feet. <br /> <br />211-0W A: . <br />This well is shown to be 34 feet deep on Figure 9C while the log indicates that the boring <br />was advanced only to 30 feet. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />40-0WA: <br />The boring log and well construction diagram indicate that this well is 25 feet deep and <br />screened from 15 to 25 feet. Table 3 suggests the well is 28 feet deep and screened from <br />16 to 26 feet. Figure 9M shows the well screen from 1 to 11 feet. An error is apparent <br />in illustrating the well and boring. The correct ground surface elevation for this well <br />should be 954.2 (NGVD) which is approximately 13.7 feet higher 'than shown on Figures <br />9H and 9M. Correct placement of the well screen shows the well situated in lean clay <br />of low hydraulic conductivity as is evident on Table 9. <br /> <br />Reinterpretation of the geology includes the SMIML unit within which P-40B is screened <br />as till. The corrected interpretation correlates much better with adjacent boring 39-0W A. <br />