Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Ms. Amy Hadiaris <br />Minnesota Pollution Control Agency <br />September 28, 1993 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />The comprehensive remedial approach should promote a cost effective and timely <br />remediation of the site and allow for appropriate long term budgeting. EnecoTech <br />suggests that ERL be required to submit the comprehensive work plan in short <br />order to assure delays do not develop. <br /> <br />The County and City request that ERL submit a workplan outlining the completion of tasks <br />presented in this letter as well as tasks required for the completion of the Feasibility Study (FS) <br />report. A Gantt chart should also be prepared showing task completion time frames and task <br />interrelationships. The time frame for the schedule and Gantt chart should be based on time <br />periods following critical events. The Gantt chart should be flexible in nature and allow for <br />modifications should uncontrollable schedule delays arise. <br /> <br />At this time, the County and City are reviewing ERL's landfill gas monitoring program and <br />would like to discuss that issue as well as the concerns outlined above with the MPCA. Per our <br />recent discussions, a meeting has been arranged with you at MPCA's office at 10:00 a.m. on <br />October 12, 1993 . We look forward to addressing these issues with you. Your time and <br />e consideration is appreciated. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />St~en Rohlf ~ <br />City of Elk River <br /> <br />cc: Mr. Lanny Peissig, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, St. Paul, MN <br />Ms. Kathleen Heaney, Sherburne County, Elk River, Minnesota <br />Mr. Steven McManamon, EnecoTech Midwest, Inc., Bloomington, MN <br />Mr. Matthew Ledvina, Bruce A. Liesch and Associates, Minneapolis, Minnesota <br /> <br />d\ 7 41-00 l.Itr <br /> <br />e <br />