Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- 14 . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />8. Traffic circles have been employed at low-volume, local street <br />intersections to control speed. Speed control circles occupy <br />a large central portion of the intersections, thereby forcing <br />traffic to slow in negotiating its way around these circles. <br />In practice, circles were found to hav~ relatively little speed <br />control effectiveness. . <br /> <br />9. A choker is' a narrowing of the street, either at an intersection <br />or at midblock, to constrain the width of the travelled way. <br />Except where the narrowing is extreme enough to limit use of the <br />"choked" section to one direction at a time, chokers have gener- <br />ally not had significant effect on traffic volume or speed. <br /> <br />D. Passive controls involve the use of regulatory signs and markings to <br />inform the driver that a specific action is not permitted, while not <br />physically preventing the action. As such, passive controls are more <br />easily violated than most physical controls. Their advantages include <br />the fact that some can be in force during only portions of the day. <br />They also impose fewer constraints on emergency vehicles, which can <br />ignore them when necessary with little problem or hazard. Experience <br />has shown that even with the violations, some passive controls produce <br />a significant improvement in the volume and speed of traffic on local <br />streets. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />1. The most effective form of passive control appears to be an area <br />system of one-wa streets. Either a "full maze" system or a <br />"l imited entry" pattern Figure 1) can substantially discourage <br />through traffic by creating system discontinuities. They have <br />minimal adverse effects on emergency vehicles and they tend to <br />be more respected by motorists than other "passive" devices. <br />One-way streets may also result in substantial reductions in <br />accidents at local street intersections by reducing potential <br />traffic conflicts. <br /> <br />2. Turn prohibitions involve the use of standard "No Right-Turn" or <br />"No Left-Turn" signs, with or without peak hour limitations. <br />These prevent turning movements onto local streets, thereby <br />reducing volume. They are best used at the perophery of a <br />residential area rather than within it. Turn prohobitions are <br />generally more effective and more easily enforceable than <br />"No Thru Traffic" prohibitions used under similar conditions. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />3. Although.thebasic purpose of stopsignsjs to assign right of <br />way ,..they.have,frequently been. used in attemptsto.cpntrob. < <br />traffic, volume and .speeds on locaL streets. Such use of stop <br />,signs is generally inappropriate and ineffective for speed. <br />contro] , and excessive use of them (especially 4;way stops), < <br />breeds contempt' for all traffic control devices..;; Speed reduc-, <br />_tions are;generally limited to within about 200geet of the . <br />stop sign, while midblock speeds may actually increase. How- <br />ever, if they reduce the speed of, or divert the few very fast <br />drivers who tend to be the most disturbing to residents, resi- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />.....~. <br /> <br /> <br />v <br />