My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2.0. SR 09-08-1993
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1993
>
09/08/1993 - SPECIAL
>
2.0. SR 09-08-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:18 AM
Creation date
6/28/2006 3:14:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/8/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Budget Work Session Memo <br />September 2, 1993 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Comprehensive Plan, an economical option is to hire an intern <br />to do some of the day to day planning activities so that Steve <br />can concentrate on this large project. <br /> <br />Another issue for the City Council to review is our policy on <br />placing general fund monies into reserves for future capital <br />outlay expenditures. This is especially relevant as it relates <br />to the Fire Department request for funding of a $300,000 pumper <br />in 1998. Attached for your review is a list of the proposed <br />1994 capital outlay requests. <br /> <br />Related to the capital outlay issue is the use of equipment <br />certificates. The City would like to move away from the use of <br />this financing tool as it is essentially a three to five year <br />loan to finance the purchase of equipment. Equipment <br />certificates were used out of necessity when levy limits were <br />in place. It is uncertain as to how much, if any, of the <br />equipment certificate requests can be incorporated into the <br />general fund budget. <br /> <br />Another budget issue that may need review by the City Council <br />is the possibility of having the seal coating program special <br />assessed to the benefitted property owners. The City has <br />always considered this activity a maintenance expense, but many <br />communities have this program special assessed out to the <br />benefitted homeowners and property owners. <br /> <br />Two other financial issues that mayor may not be directly <br />related to the budget include a city-wide storm sewer fee and <br />changes in the special assessment manual. The City has <br />discussed generating revenues for a storm sewer program, and, <br />at this time, the preferred method is to add an expense to the <br />utility bill. The amount of the charge and the formula used to <br />determine the charge have yet to be discussed, however, this <br />method is preferred to adding an amount to the City levy. The <br />Council has also discussed changing the Assessment Manual <br />whereby the City funds a larger amount of street improvement <br />projects. If this were to take place, the City would have to <br />create a street improvement fund and the assumed financial <br />source would be a city-wide levy. <br /> <br />The City Council needs to discuss its priorities for the 1994 <br />and beyond work years. As the City adds new programs, offers <br />better services, and adds more personnel to provide for these <br />new programs and services, then the overall City finances are <br />affected as is the City tax rate and levy. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.