My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.0. SR 08-23-1993
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1993
>
08/23/1993
>
5.0. SR 08-23-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:18 AM
Creation date
6/28/2006 3:03:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/23/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />taxes go to city government, the median response among those who <br />offered an answer was fifteen percent. But, thirty-four percent <br />of the sample, a little higher than the norm, were unable to even <br />venture a guess. Fifty-eight percent of the sample correctly <br />said that the city's tax rate had increased during the past few <br />years. While more information about the cost-efficiency of city <br />services should be provided to residents, citizens seem to have a <br />fairly accurate view of the tax climate in Elk River. <br /> <br />Communications patterns revealed that most residents, <br />eighty-six percent, rely upon the "Elk River star" for <br />information about City government and its activities. The <br />"grapevine" was relied upon by ten percent, at the norm for most <br />communities. Only twenty-four percent of the residents reported <br />their households currently received cable television; hence, the <br />telecasting of city council meetings could potentially reach only <br />one-quarter of the city. But, the projected audience for <br />occasional viewership would be about one-third of those <br />households, or eight percent citywide. The City may wish to <br />consider the publication of a newsletter on a regular basis to <br />augment the local newspaper. While communication channels are <br />very strong, this vehicle would provide an excellent means to <br />inform the citizenry about on-going activities and programs. In <br />addition, insertion of the newsletter into the "Elk River Star" <br />would effectively reach almost ninety percent of the residents. <br /> <br />e The City was felt to be "about right" in its enforcement of <br />city codes. Fifty-nine percent awarded that rating, but thirty <br />percent indicated that the enforcement was "not tough enough." <br />Particularly troublesome to these residents was the code <br />enforcement on, first, loose animals, and second, messy yards. <br />The city may wish to re-examine its enforcement procedures, <br />particularly as they apply to dogs running loose. <br /> <br />city services were rated unevenly by the residents of Elk <br />River. Police protection, fire protection, and the City Library <br />were awarded strong approval scores of approximately eighty <br />percent. Sewers and water was viewed favorably by fifty-four <br />percent of the residents; sixteen percent disapproved. All of <br />these evaluations are consistent with norms established in <br />previous studies. Three services, however, were given much lower <br />positive evaluations and much lower negative scores than usual: <br />snow plowing was approved of by sixty-nine percent and <br />disapproved of by thirty percent; street maintenance was viewed <br />favorably by sixty-seven percent and unfavorably by thirty-four <br />percent; and, street lighting was rated as "excellent" or "good" <br />by fifty seven percent, and rated "only fair" or "poor" by a high <br />thirty-nine percent. The City was wish to review these three <br />services for problems and potential improvements. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />City staff served an unusually large number of residents <br />directly. Forty-six percent, about twenty percent higher than <br />the norm, had "quite a lot" or "some" first hand contact with the <br />City staff. Evaluations, however, were weaker than usual. <br />Fifty-nine percent rated the City staff as either "excellent" or <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.