Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />who visited that park during the past twelve months. Lions Park <br />ranked second at a usage rate of sixty-six percent. Facilities <br />located at the schools drew visitors from fifty-one percent of <br />the households in Elk River. Handke outdoor Ice Arena and the <br />softball complex attracted members of about forty percent of the <br />households in the city during the past year. Woodland Trails <br />Park, virtually undeveloped, was visited by only ten percent of <br />the sample's households. While Orono Park is the pre-eminent <br />facility in the park system, Lions Park and school-based <br />offerings also serve large segments of the community. <br /> <br />Park visitors were queried about the types of recreational <br />facilities they used most frequently. Most respondents reported <br />passively walking around the park they visited. But, the <br />swimming beach was used on at least an occasional basis by sixty <br />percent of the households in the city. Softball fields and play <br />equipment served about forty percent of the households. The <br />picnic pavillions, sliding hills, and soccer fields possessed a <br />smaller, but significant audience within Elk River. In <br />comparison with other communities, Elk River residents use the <br />park and recreational facilities in atypically high numbers. <br /> <br />The City received kudos for its maintenance and upkeep of <br />the park facilities. Eighty-eight percent approved of the city's <br />efforts, while only eight percent expressed disapproval. As for <br />unmet needs, only trails were mentioned frequently enough, at <br />seven percent, to warrant further study. <br /> <br />The residents were asked their opinion of a more extensive <br />trail system to link the city's neighborhoods. The concept was <br />favored by a large seventy-six percent majority. However, when <br />the subject of property tax increases to pay for its development <br />was raised, half of the support changed opinions: a forty <br />percent to thirty-eight percent negative verdict occurred. There <br />would be substantial difficulty, consequently, in passing a <br />referendum at this time. <br /> <br />A nearly similar pattern emerged on the question of a <br />downtown river walk. Seventy-three percent favored the concept. <br />But, if property tax increases would be required to fund the <br />construction, then a forty-four percent to thirty-seven percent <br />plurality emerged in favor of the project. This project would be <br />viable at the polls, but a highly effective and aggressive <br />campaign would be needed to carry the day. <br /> <br />Residents felt strongly, however, about the characteristics <br />of any trail system in Elk River. Seventy-six percent felt it <br />should serve both pedestrians and bicyclists. Seventy percent <br />wanted to see the recently purchased abandoned railroad corridor <br />developed into a component of the system. And, surprisingly, <br />one-half of the residents would grant the City an easement if the <br />trail system ran by their property. Reinforcing these results, <br />trails were also narrowly designated the priority for <br />development, edging smaller neighborhood parks and outdistancing <br />larger community playfields. The concept, then, is highly <br /> <br />3 <br />