My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.9. SR 08-16-1993
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1993
>
08/16/1993
>
4.9. SR 08-16-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:17 AM
Creation date
6/28/2006 2:54:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/19/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />TIF No. 1 and No. 3 Nuance <br /> <br />Minnesota Statutes addresses how a municipality may expend TIF <br />funds from a TIF District. Put simply, TIF funds from a small <br />geographic area known as a TIF District can be expended on <br />limited, eligible items or projects that are found outside of <br />the TIF District but within the broader "project area". In Elk <br />River, the project area is the corporate limits. <br /> <br />Although TIF funds <br />Main, and are proposed <br />project, the nuance <br />that of not creating a <br /> <br />were used in the 1992 project at Evans and <br />to be used for the 1993 office-townhouse <br />or wrinkle with the use of these funds is <br />new TIF District. <br /> <br />The City Council and EDA Commissioners are acutely aware of the <br />ramifications of creating new TIF Districts. The primary <br />consequence of a new TIF District is that of a loss of a <br />portion of the City's state aid. With recent TIF Districts, <br />the City, EDA, and HRA have placed the loss of state aid burden <br />on the project's end user. That is, the end user, pursuant to <br />a contract for private development, agrees to make the City <br />whole in the event the newly-created TIF District results in <br />the loss of state aid. During the most recent legislative <br />session, developer payment of state aid losses was prohibited. <br /> <br />Ie <br /> <br />Given this new restriction, a city may be far better off in <br />using TIF funds from existing Districts to help leverage certain <br />projects. Because no TIF District is created, the City, <br />through its leveraged TIF funds, enables a project like Mr. <br />Chuba's to go immediately on the tax rolls for the benefit of <br />the local taxing jurisdictions (city, county, and school <br />district) . <br /> <br />Because this is an owner-occupied office project, the end-users <br />would likely suffer the consequences of the creation of a new <br />TIF District. However, if Mr. Chuba was proposing the <br />construction of speculative office space that he would own <br />long-term, he, rather than the end users, would suffer the <br />consequences of any loss in state aid. <br /> <br />Main Street Corridor <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The writer of this memo views the Main Street corridor from <br />Highway 169 to Highway 10 as a critical corridor for Elk <br />River. Given the recent projects along Main Street and Evans <br />Avenue, it is reasonable to expect that similar projects will <br />occur along this corridor so that eventually it will connect <br />with the traditional Central Business District area at Main <br />Street and Jackson Avenue. Most of these projects, however, <br />will require substantial demolition and site preparation <br />costs. That's where TIF funds from No. 1 and No. 3 come into <br />play. The alternative is to encourage the conversion of single <br />family homes along this corridor into office-type uses. <br />Utilizing funds from TIF Districts No. 1 and No.3, the City <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.