Laserfiche WebLink
<br />License & CUP Renewal, ConTeck <br />May 13, 1993 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />------------------------------ <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Referencing <br />paragraphs <br />document: <br /> <br />the <br />will <br /> <br />conditional use permit, the following <br />highlight staff's recommended changes to that <br /> <br />Section 1 - Scope And Conduct of Operation <br /> <br />a. The updated MPCA air emissions permit number has been <br />added to this section. <br /> <br />b. Staff is proposing language that more specifically <br />spells out that the operation is for the treatment of <br />petroleum contaminated soil only. <br /> <br />c. The last proposed change to this section is to allow <br />for a staff review and consequently, approval or veto <br />of an alternative treatment facility at this site <br />based on the alternative facilities' ability to meet <br />the emissions standards set forth in this permit and <br />MPCA's air emissions permit. Staff also allowed for <br />Mr. Kreger to have an appeal process with the <br />Council, if he does not agree with staff's review of <br />an alternative facility. <br /> <br />Section 2 - Specific Requirements <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />(01) Conditions Precedent - In this section, staff removed <br />the condition that the permit was subject to approval <br />of a contingency action plan for the landfill. A <br />contingency action plan has been approved and this <br />condition is no longer needed. <br /> <br />(02) Soil Storage During the original review in 1990, <br />Mr. Kreger indicated the stock piles of soil waiting <br />for treatment would be covered with dirt to avoid the <br />petroleum products from being volatized (vaporized <br />and released to the atmosphere). As far as staff <br />knows, this has not been done. Another concern with <br />the stock piles is fugitive dust. Because of these <br />issues, staff is proposing the maximum storage <br />allowed be 20,000 cubic yards. <br /> <br />(06) Testing Schedule For Residues - Staff is proposing to <br />revise this language to take into consideration the <br />fact that an alternative facility may not be equipped <br />with the same pollution control equipment as the <br />original facility. The new language proposed by <br />staff would allow for testing of residue from <br />whatever equipment is used on an alternative facility. <br /> <br />e <br />