Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Elk River Parks & Recreation <br />Indoor Air Quality Assessment <br />IE.;\ Project No. 7805-1301 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Concentration Qualitative Assessment <br />(colony formin2 units/2ram) of Funeal Counts in Carpet Dust <br />< 1 00,000 Not a significant presence of fungal spores. <br /> Ho\vever, there lTIay still be an indication of interior gro\vth if donlinant* or <br /> upper-ranked taxa are associated \vith gro\vth on moisture-impacted building <br /> materials. <br />100,000 to 1,000,000 Suggestive of Fungal Gro\vth if donlinant* or upper-ranked taxa are <br /> associated \vith gro\vth on moisture-inlpacted building materials. <br /> Or <br /> Suggestive of Migration from the outdoors if dominant taxa are COffiITIOn <br /> outdoor fungi. The greater the fungal count levels, the greater the likelihood <br /> that the carpet should be considered dirty. <br />> 1,000,000 Indicative of interior Fungal Gro\vth if dominant* or upper-ranked taxa are <br /> associated \vith gro\vth on nloisture-impacted building materials, <br /> Or <br /> Inadequate removal of outdoor fungal spores through cleaning if dominant <br /> taxa are common outdoor fungi. <br /> <br />*For this table, dominant is defined as constituting greater than fifty percent of the total fungal concentration. <br /> <br />. Discussion of Results <br /> <br />Fungal concentrations in the dust collected fronl belo\v the chair nlat in the South\vest Cubicle indicate <br />the presence of fungal gro\vth on the carpet. Aspergillus versicolor \vas dominant in the sample. <br /> <br />Heavy fungal concentrations \vere present in the dust collected from along the \vall in the South\vest <br />Office. Aspergillus versicolor \vas dominant in the sample. These results indicate that fungal gro\\/ih <br />has occurred on the carpet. <br /> <br />4.5 General Indoor Air Quality Parameters <br /> <br />Carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, ten1perature and relative huntidity levels \vere n1easured in each <br />complaint area and outdoors for comparison. Results are listed belo\v: <br /> <br />Table 5: GenerallAQ Parameters - May 9, 2006 <br /> <br />Location Time No. of Carbon Dioxide I Carbon IVlonoxide Temperature Rela tive <br /> Occ. (CO2) (CO) (OF) Humidity <br /> (ppm) (ppm) (0/0 ) <br />Cubicle Area 2:20 pm 1 605 0 74 43 <br />IYlichelle's Office 2:22 pm 1 I 622 0 74 44 <br />Bill's Office 2:24 pm 1 629 0 74 44 <br />Outdoors 2:25 pm - 359 0 70 43 <br /> <br />Ouick Reference Guideline: <br />At present, indoor air quality regulatory limits do not exist apart from OSHA's Permissible Exposure Linlits (PELs), <br />\vhich \vere developed for traditional industrial environments and are not a suitable n1easure of good indoor air quality. <br />The follo\ving guidelines have generally been adopted by the practitioners of indoor air quality. <br /> <br />. Carbon Dioxide (C02) <br />The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 62- <br />1989, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, recommends as a guideline that indoor CO2 levels do <br />not exceed over 700 ppm above the outdoor CO2 level. Generally, the number of reported air quality <br />complaints tends to increase as the CO2 levels climb past 1,200 ppm. If CO2 levels significantly exceed <br />1,200 ppn1 in occupied areas, additional evaluation should be considered \vhich may include ventilation or <br />specific contaminant testing. <br /> <br />. Carbon I\Ionoxide (CO) <br />Recomn1ended indoor air quality guidelines have been proposed to maintain indoor CO levels belo\\' 10 ppm. <br />Headaches, nausea and dizziness can be reported \vhen CO levels approach and exceed 10 ppm, Ho\vever, in <br />most indoor environments \vithout a knO\Vll CO source, a CO level of 5 ppm should be considered significant <br />and additional investigation is \varranted. <br /> <br />C:\Documents and Settings\tallard\Local Settings\Ten1porary Internet Files\OLKF\attach to 5 8.doc <br />