My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.0. SR 02-15-1993
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1993
>
02/15/1993
>
5.0. SR 02-15-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:07 AM
Creation date
5/25/2006 2:05:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
2/15/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />While I hope to not get too hung up discussing specific <br />projects, some projects do need to be reviewed by the City <br />Council. These projects include the following: <br /> <br />- The WWTP expansion update (see attachments) <br />- The East Highway 10 Feasibility Study (see attachment) <br />- The Jackson Avenue/Highway 169 Feasibility Study (see <br />attachment) <br />- The Elk Park Center Traffic Study and EAW that has <br />previously been distributed (these topics may not need to <br />be discussed at this 2/15/ meeting.) <br />Action is necessary on the County Road 1 project (see <br />attachment) <br />- Discussion needs to take place on the Lake Orono dredging <br />proposal (Homeowners Association meeting is scheduled for <br />2/18/93) <br />- The City Council needs to review the City owned property <br />along Highway 169 (approximately 5 acres directly north of <br />the MnDOT garage) as the City has received a request to <br />sell this land. <br /> <br />In addition to the above projects, <br />planning a brief update on the traffic <br />drainage study. <br /> <br />the City Engineer is <br />study and the storm <br /> <br />Staff is prepared to discuss each of the above projects in any <br />amount of detail that is desired by the City Council. However, <br />if a few of the items listed above each generates a half hour <br />or more of discussion, then it is likely that we will not make <br />much progress on the CIP as originally proposed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.