Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Alternatives for TIF Grant Request <br />January 6, 1993 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />In reviewing and analyzing potential sources of assistance <br />available to the company, it was concluded that the creation of <br />a new TIF District may not be feasible. That is, based on: <br /> <br />- the contemplated level of TIF assistance sought, <br />- the finished market value of the expansion project, <br />- current Assessor's market value of the vacant lot, <br />likely capitalized interest if EDA-City borrowing is <br />required, <br />- limitation on the number of years tax increments may be <br />collected, <br /> <br />the cost of creating a new TIF District outweighs the benefits <br />of TIF assistance. <br /> <br />Alternatives to the creation of a new TIF District include: <br /> <br />-No TIF assistance <br />- Amending an existing District or Districts where the <br />amount of new tax increments collected exceeds the debt <br />service required by previously issued bonds. <br /> <br />In that vein, I am suggesting that the EDA and City Council <br />consider an amendment to TIF Districts No. 1 and No. 3 in order <br />to provide a TIF Grant to Perf-form Products. Presumably, this <br />request will be similar to the Chuba Company's TIF request in <br />early 1992. TIF law enables tax increments generated from a <br />"District" to be expended in the broader "project area" or <br />"development district". In the case of Elk River, the entire <br />community is located in a development district. With the Chuba <br />request for assistance, tax increment funds from Districts No. <br />1 and No. 3 were expended in the broader development district <br />and the funds were used to reimburse Mr. Chuba for certain <br />demolition and site preparation costs associated with his <br />office project at Evans Avenue and Main Street. <br /> <br />Assuming that Perf-form Products can document eligible expenses <br />for which TIF funds can be used as reimbursement, it may be <br />possible to utilize tax increment funds from District No. 1 and <br />No. 3 for this process. Likely eligible expenses for which the <br />company may seek reimbursement includes: <br /> <br />- Off site infrastructure <br />extension of a frontage road <br />- On site utility improvements <br />- General site preparation. <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />improvements (that is, <br />across a portion of Lot 2) <br /> <br />Lastly, the advantage of amending an existing district results <br />in the local taxing jurisdictions benefitting immediately from <br />the new development. That is, since a new district is not <br />created, the project's new property taxes are not captured by <br />an EDA, but rather, the taxes go directly to the County for <br />redistribution to the local jurisdictions. <br />