Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Economic Development Authority Minutes <br />September 13, 1999 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />major issues of the plan. Paul reviewed the Modification Committee's top four <br />priorities of the Strategic Plan, which consisted of: <br /> <br />. Issue No. 1 - Growth Industrial Base <br />Goal: Develop West Business Park <br />. Issue No. 2 - Business Retention Growth <br />Goal: Retain and Grow Existing Industrial Firms <br />. Issue NO.3 - Marketing Strategy <br />Goal: Develop a Marketing Strategy <br />. Issue NO.4 - Develop/Redevelop East Highway 10 and CBD Area <br />Goal: Undertake Activities to Facilitate Development and <br />Redevelopment on East Highway 10 and in the CBD <br /> <br />Discussion was held regarding the issue of how the development of a <br />transportation plan fits in with the 4 priorities. The EDA consented that the <br />transportation issue revolved around access and the amount of traffic in Elk River, <br />and further that transportation is an important issue relating to economic <br />development. The City Administrator noted that the city has a transportation <br />plan that it is part of the overall city Comprehensive Plan. He further noted that it <br />is the city's intention to work with other agencies to improve the traffic situation in <br />the city. Commissioner Klinzing noted that it might be best for the City Council to <br />deal with the transportation issue. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Commissioner Motin indicated a concern regarding redevelopment of the <br />Central Business District area. He questioned whether redevelopment consisted <br />of preservation and/or restoration of the downtown area. Commissioner Motin <br />indicated that if the intent were to develop a historical theme, he would be <br />opposed to that type of redevelopment. President Dwyer stated that some of <br />the buildings are historical in nature. He further stated that it is important to work <br />with the downtown BEFORE it becomes an undesirable area. <br /> <br />Commissioner Klinzing suggested that a time frame be placed on the plan. Paul <br />Steinman suggested that 2000-2002, or 2003 be included as the time frame. <br /> <br />Discussion was held regarding whether the action items listed on the plan would <br />require specific EDA approval, and whether the plan should specifically state that <br />the action items require specific EDA approval. Commissioner Klinzing indicated <br />that without the written verbiage indicating that the action plans require EDA <br />approval, the plan suggests that the EDA is giving staff the authority to move <br />forward on the entire plan. Mayor Klinzing noted that she is concerned with the <br />way that the document is worded and will vote against the adoption of the <br />action plan because there are certain items in the plan that she does not agree <br />with. Commissioner Motin suggested that each item be addressed in the plan <br />before the entire plan is passed. Commissioner Gongoll noted that the action <br />plan is consistent with the original Strategic Plan, and that he is comfortable with <br />the document as presented. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Following further discussion by the EDA regarding this issue, it was suggested that <br />the issues in the plan that need additional discussion be specifically identified. <br />