My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.5. SR 05-15-2006
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2006
>
05/15/2006
>
6.5. SR 05-15-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:03 AM
Creation date
5/12/2006 10:22:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/15/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Case File: CU 06-10 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Attachments <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Cover Sheet <br />Location Map <br />Applicants Narrative <br />Proposed Renderings <br />Order Granting Conditional Use dated 12-22-2204 <br />Previously Approved Elevations <br />Site Plan <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Overview <br /> <br />The Jackson Street Villas Planned Unit Development (PUD) was approved in January, 2005 <br />with a condition that brick shall be include on the front and sides of all units. Due to <br />financial concerns and the desire to create affordable units, the applicant would like to <br />remove the brick from the ends of the buildings. <br /> <br />Also being requested is that the decks become 2-feet wider and 2-feet deeper (an 8'x10' <br />deck). Staff has no objection to this particular request. The applicant will need to verify that <br />this amount of cantilever deck is allowed with the Building Division. <br /> <br />Analysis <br /> <br />The applicant believes that reducing the amount of brick will significantly reduce the <br />construction costs of the project which in turn will result in more favorable unit costs that <br />they believe the area can support. <br /> <br />A great deal of discussion regarding the amount of brick was discussed with the Planning <br />Commission. It was agreed that the brick treatments need to continue around the ends of <br />each building to enhance the public curb appeal. <br /> <br />The majority of the units, as approved, would only be 20-feet apart. Since public curb <br />appeal was the reason, staff would recommend that the brick remain on the ends with this <br />more public exposure. These would be the ends of units: 1,30, 31, 38, 39, 64, 65 and 76. <br />The remainder of the end units either face one another or are internal to the site. <br /> <br />To maintain the integrity of the originally approved Conditional Use Permit, staff is <br />recommending that eight of the end units maintain the originally required brick treatment. <br />This would result in one quarter of the end units requiring brick. <br /> <br />Standards for Issuance of a Conditional Use Permit (Section 30-654) <br /> <br />The issuance of a Conditional Use Permit can be ordered only if the use at the proposed <br />location: <br /> <br />S:\PLANNING\Case Files\2006\CUP\CU 06-10 Jackson St Villas\CU 06-IO_CC.doc <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.