Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Economic Development Authority Meeting <br />May 10, 1993 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />the effect the shore land ordinance may have on the plan regarding the <br /> <br />encroachment to the river. <br /> <br />Chris Bulow reviewed the cost and financing of the proposed project. <br />Mr. Bulow indicated that he is anxious to move ahead with the project <br />and requested comments from the EDA regarding the proposal. He <br />indicated that he is considering a completion date of April or June, <br />1994. Commissioner Gongoll indicated that he felt the proposal was a <br />good use of the space. He further stated that there has been other <br />developers interested in this site, however, no one has come forward at <br />this time. <br /> <br />Bill Rubin indicated that the EDA and staff have an obligation to the <br />developer regarding the property. He suggested that the EDA consider <br />offering some type of option to take the site off the market to give <br />the developer the assurance he needs before he spends limited time and <br />financial resources on the project. It was the consensus of the EDA to <br />consider this at its next meeting. <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />Proposed Revisions to Loan Policy Guidelines <br /> <br />Bill Rubin informed the EDA that two rev~s~ons are proposed to the EDA <br />Revolving Loan Policy Guidelines. Bill Rubin explained that the first <br />change deals with what occurs when a company relocates out of Elk River <br />after a loan has been approved. He suggested offering the following <br />language to revise the policy: "A loan shall become due and payable in <br />full if a business relocates out of the City of Elk River prior to the <br />maturity date of the EDA loan." <br /> <br />Bill Rubin indicated that the second revision relates to the adjustment <br />in the EDA's interest rate. He suggested the following revision to the <br />Revolving Loan Fund Guidelines: "The interest rate may be adjusted at <br />intervals that are mutually agreed to by the EDA and the business." <br /> <br />Commissioner Duitsman indicated that he supports the repayment of the <br />loan if a business moves out of town. However, he questioned the <br />purpose of adjusting the interest rate. He indicated that this would <br />not benefit the City as interest rates would never be adjusted upward, <br />only downward, and therefore benefit the borrower. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dwyer suggested tying the interest to the prime rate. <br /> <br />Bill Rubin indicated that the reason for adding the language is to <br />eliminate any notion by the borrower that the interest rate is locked <br />over the life of the loan and, further, that it is not the intention to <br />renegotiate the interest. <br /> <br />Commissioner Duitsman indicated that he would not have a <br />the language if the interest is negotiated up front <br />development. Bill Rubin indicated the rate was disclosed <br />documents. <br /> <br />problem with <br />at the time of <br />in the loan <br /> <br />PRESIDENT GONGOLL MOVED TO ACCEPT THE FIRST REVISION TO THE REVOLVING <br />LOAN FUND POLICY GUIDELINES AS STATED IN THE MEMO TO THE EDA FROM BILL <br />