My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.6. SR 05-08-2006
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2006
>
05/08/2006
>
5.6. SR 05-08-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:59 AM
Creation date
5/4/2006 2:37:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/8/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2) In 2005, the City Council reviewed a 10-year revenue expenditure model that was <br />very general in nature. This modeling was done to better understand the impacts of a <br />pavement management plan and the strategies associated with how to pay for the <br />same. The proposed "land Use Financial Plan" will be of the same style but will run <br />for 20 years and be very specific in nature. <br /> <br />3) Unlike Metropolitan communities that can rely on Fiscal Disparities as an <br />equalization method, if market value revenue falls short of service needs, Elk River <br />will need to stand alone on its' final build-out level. <br /> <br />4) Most cities that have a population base of 36,000 have a geographic area to service of <br />between 8 to 12 square miles. Elk River will have to service a community that is 45 <br />square miles which could translate to a higher per capita cost for basic services. <br /> <br />5) At the present time, the City has significant revenue infusions that may not be <br />available at the time of final build-out including land fill fees, payment -in-lieu at the <br />NRG and significantly less permitting fees. Although all of these revenue sources do <br />not directly go into the general fund they still represent a value that is equal to 20% of <br />the general fund budget. <br /> <br />6) A valuation market study, depending on the detail, could be structured to understand <br />and better budget for future needs such as capital improvements, equipment and <br />facilities, reserves, pavement management, personnel additions or modifications <br />based on when growth will happen and the type of revenue generated. <br /> <br />7) A study relating to timing and the type of value being generated is important to the <br />overall financial review of servicing the northern area of the City (gravel mining area <br />and commercial reserve) in light of needed infrastructure improvements that will <br />carry significant debt. <br /> <br />8) The final and most important reason for this study is to determine if a valuation <br />problem exists and if so, what types of policies should be initiated to achieve the <br />values necessary to support appropriate services. A prime example of this will be the <br />opening of the gravel mining areas for development and the commercial reserves <br />located in the northern half of the City on the east side of 169, respectively. The <br />City's planning studies would normally look at appropriate land uses based on typical <br />organizational assumptions such as roads, proper land use transitions and on-going <br />City policies of density, product type, etc. However, if a valuation gap does exist it <br />could lead to modifications as to the appropriate land use and the timing of when <br />development could occur. Another example of how this type of study could assist the <br />City is engaging the EDA in discussing whether employment or project value should <br />be the prime motivators for future assistance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.