Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />May 24, 1982 <br />Page Two <br /> <br />Mr. Mills indicated that the do\vntown only was very concerned about what was happen- <br />ing. Mr. Mills indicated that the only study available to them was the study done <br />by Mr. Zack Johnson, City Planner, in 1979. The do\vutown felt that they needed some <br />input on this whole area from some professional views. <br /> <br />Chairman Tracy indicated that the Planning Commission had already approved the square <br />footage in dealing with the concept being presented by Mr. Santwire tonight. <br /> <br />Gary Santwire indicated that there were two 8,000 square foot buildings planned orig- <br />inally; now the two 8,000 square foot buildings would not be there. Mr. Santwire <br />is only changing the distribution of the square footage within the approved commer- <br />cial area of the PUD. <br /> <br />Chairman Tracy asked Mr. Sant\rire what would happen to the other areas that were <br />originally being considered for commercial use, now that it is all being packed to- <br />gether on one area. Chairman Tracy further asked Mr. Santwire if he anticipated more <br />gro\vth corrunercially \vithin. that area in the future. <br /> <br />Mr. Sant~ire indicated that two of the sites in question were no longer o\vned by him. <br />Mr. Santwire further indicated that possibly both sides might be built on or marketed <br />for further commercial development. <br /> <br />General discussion was carried on where Mr. Santwire indicated that if you count every- <br />thing that is being proposed, and if you were to use the maximum allowable footage <br />for lots 3 and 4, you would then come up with the same amount of footage within 100 <br />square feet of what was originally proposed. Since the original site plan was approved, <br />some of the lots became somewhat smaller in size because of the expansion of the <br />drainage area. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER PEARCE MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE NEW CONCEPT PROPOSAL BY GARY SANT- <br />WIRE FOR LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 6, BARRINGTON PLACE, ON THE BASIS THAT IT DOES NOT REP- <br />RESENT AN INCREASE IN SPACE BUT IS RELATIVELY THE SAlvfE AS ORIGINALLY PROPOSED. THE <br />MOTION "(.JAS SECONDED BY COMM:TSSIONER GUNKEL. THE MOTION PASSED 3-0. <br /> <br />5. Consider Landscape Approval for Kentucky Fried Chicken <br /> <br />Mr. Gary Santwire presented the information to the Planning Commission regarding the <br />landscape approval for Kentucky Fried Chicken. Mr. Santwire indicated he was rep- <br />resenting Mr. Bill Morrow, President of Anoka Kentucky Fried Chicken. The Elk River <br />Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant is proposed to be built on Lot 1, Block 7, Barring- <br />ton Place. Mr. Santwire further indicated that Mr. Morrow owns the site in question. <br />Mr. Santwire explained the site plan and blueprint of the proposed building, includ- <br />ing photographs of the ForrestLake Kentucky Fried Chicken. The Elk River Kentucky <br />Fried Chicken is to be built similar to the Forrest Lake building. <br /> <br />Discussion followed between Mr. Santwire and the Planning Commission regarding the <br />site of the Kentucky Fried Chicken. Mr. Santwire further indicated that signage <br />would not be a problem. <br /> <br />Chairman Tracy asked Rick Breezee about the height of the sign for Kentucky Fried <br />Chicken. <br />