My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-22-1982 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1980 - 1989
>
1982
>
03-22-1982 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:58 AM
Creation date
4/25/2006 2:32:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
3/22/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />March 22, 1982 <br />Page Eight <br /> <br />After considerable discussion of Item 900.2(d) it was agreed that the words <br />tI~vood or masonry" should be deleted to read as follo\vs: <br /> <br />"Portable Utility structures not exceeding 120 square feet in size may be <br />permitted in any residential or agricultural zoned area and may be constructed <br />of metal and comply with the required setbacks. The structures must be an- <br />chored to the ground." <br /> <br />CO}illISSIONER GUNKEL MADE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE ORDINANCE LANGUAGE AS REVISED IN- <br />CLUSIVE OF A CLEAR DEFINITION OF THE TERM "AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES." COM:MISSIONER <br />PEARCE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br /> <br />9. Review Procedure for Conditional Use Permits <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce stated he believed that as long as the staff has accepted the <br />responsibility for administering conditional. use permits, no action other than <br />that would have to be taken since any problems would be reported by neighbors. <br /> <br />Chairman Tracy said a time limit was a good idea, though, because it would allow <br />for the CUP to be put in a come-up file for systematic review. <br /> <br />I <br />Commissioner Pearce agreed there should be regular review by City staff, but if <br />reapplication is required, a fee would have to be charged, but at a lower rate. <br /> <br />Chairman Tracy stated the Planning Commission should not have to review the CUP <br />after the first time unless a problem had developed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce agreed they should not have to come before the Planning Com- <br />mission again, but they could go back in to staff for review and renewal at a fee. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kreuser stated every CUP is different and should be reviewed; a use <br />that may have been fine two years ago may not be fine with the neighbors now. He <br />stressed that CUPs must be followed up ~r people should just be left to do what <br />they want to do. He cited that in some cases people have had a conditional use per- <br />mit for ten years and have never been checked on. <br /> <br />Chairman Tracy stated perhaps a fee should be charged for rene\val only if a problem <br />developed. Staff was asked to review the process and fee schedule for condtional use <br />permits. <br /> <br />10. Slide Presentation by the Building and Zoning Administrator <br /> <br />Mr. Breezee presented to the Planning Commission members a 20-minute slide tape <br />presentation relating to Building Safety month that will be in effect during the <br />month of April. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.