01-28-1980 PC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 3 January 28~ 1980 that was going to be a problem. An impact study had been conducted and no forseeable problems were found. Mr. Marty raised the question about sufficient land to take care of the sewage system and a requirement as to where it could be build. He stated that the average size of 1.3 acres might not be sufficient to move or add to a system and also perhaps there might be a requirement to plan it out before the houses were built. The City does not want to have to be required to put in sewage systems if these systems fail. There was a question regarding a to\Vllship road that was not on the maps, but was still on the court house records. It was stated that the property line \vould be dO"\VTl the centerline of the roads . The County road that runs north is blacktop, then gravel, so it will have to be upgraded. This will be controlled by the County engineer. There will be three streets out to the County road. There will be no assessments to the property ovmers as it comes out of the general fund. It was stated that regarding the roads in the project, that they would put in the blacktop first and then the buildings. Also, it was stated that the 2~ acre, 1.3 acre lot size would be determined by topography and soil tests. It was suggested that an instrument be written into the property deed. The public hearing was then closed. The question was asked if it was intended that these lots will be subdivided into 3 lots. It was indicated that they were asked to divide these lots in case the city water and sewer was extended to this area. There will be a considerable amount of landfill in the park and it was questioned regarding filling a swamp area and contacting the Department of Natural Resources. It was stated that there were no cattails, etc. so there should be no impact. The park area will require maintenance by the Park Board, it was suggested that this matter should be brought to the attention of the Park Board. CO}lliISSIONER TRACY MOVED APPROVAL OF THE LOT SIZE VARIANCE. COM}1ISSIONER DRIESSEN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION PASSED 5-0. COM}fISSIONER TRACY MOVED APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT. COMHISSIONER DRIESSEN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION PASSED 5-0. 7.Lawrence Koshak, Ogren Vicker's Proposal Interested in developing a commercial and single residence, was present to discussion the development with the Commissioners. The proposed develop- ment is located right on the border with Ramsey County. There will be approximately 70 acres (40 x 30). It was discussed on the feasibility of developing this area along with Ramsey. Lawrenoe Koshak and Herb Adolphson met with Ramsey. Also, there was a discussion of the Department of Natural Resources requirements along the river bank. Some kind of agreement would have to be made to allow the two communities to work together. 8. Info3::il1a1 Discussion of Proposed H\vy. 4ft10 Development Mr. Floyd Kruse was not present at this meeting, therefore no action was taken. 9. Informal Discussion on Lots 1, 2 & 3, Block 2, Auditor's Addition Discussion regarding putting up a multi-rental unit on property, to be set ~n the hill. This area is not desirable for single residence because of area garage. It would have to be re-zoned as zoning is now R-l. 10. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 10:15 p.m. Re~ec~ erbert S. Adolphson, Community Development Director