10-30-1978 PC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Oct. 30~ 1978 Meeting OI the Planning CO~TIiS5ion lJ2ge 2 COI~'TI~fISS,IorfBR F~OOTES I'JIOv~D TI{i-\.T J~ CC;I'TDITIC)ltliL USE F'EPJilIT FOR j~ ~ it T \7-'\ Gi? "\t f; D'f': Cnl,T'r il Ii\TI1\Tf"1 !J. PG'D~r SHOD I\'lECHP..I~ICAL ~_r--2P P.~-_l 'ri AB"R..4... \._....:-~~ 'r~...4":":; ..l..-.....~.Lw....) V..l'o......... .:..'; .!."U ...~ .J....T '.;..'..L .. J.., .LI,. __'"--'-, J;J'TI) TRUCK DEALERSHIP BE J"..PPRO\\TI~D YOR TJiE PROP.t;RYI DESCRIB.c.;D 11\J TIiE PA.PJi..GP~APl1 .ABOVE, l~TIT}I AF'PrtOPRIJ~TE SCP3ENII-~G AROUl\ill T"H~ EI,JTIPt.E PERII,'iETER elF TI-ill SUBJECT PROPERTY'. CCr~j}-1ISSIOI\TER DRIESSEI\J SECONDED THt; I~10TIOT~. 1':IC T 101\1 PliSSED 7-1. COjyj}lISSIOirSR THOr.:rPSOI\T OPPOSED. COl<II>'IISSIOI'TER LtJC.AS I1IOVED TH.t~T SCRE31"JII\JG FOR Tli.""E CONnITIOI\J~li..L ijSE PEPJ~TIT FOR CTJSTOI<'l I~10TORS, 11\JC. bE DEFIN~SI) AS E\TERGPJ:;EI~S OR OTHER ft..PFROPRIATE PIJ\l'}TII\JGS, T'THICH AP~ TO BE 1~'lPjJE PRIOR TO JuNt; 1! 1979 e COi.-:Il.'IISS10I'\ltJ-t IJ.tiLSOl~ 5~CONDED T1-I:C 1\10TIOl,j. 1,JIOTIOl-J P J~SSED 8-0. 8. Frelimil1ar:v Plat of Ridge,:..jood Ee..5t Lth .b;.ddition The City Fla~ner indicated that ~ne preliminary plat did not inclicate a.n intended U58 for de3ignated out lot:;., alld_ that the ZOnil1g orcline.l'1Ce aJ_lo-;'.Jecl the City to request the type of development intended for these areas. Art Raudio~ represenGlng the developer, indicated that they had no plans for these areas 8.11(i i.-.rish to incorporate the suggef;tions of the Plan.ning COffunis.sion. The City Administrator mentioned co~~ents made by members of the Cemeta~r Board relative to a buffer zone between the adjoi~ing cemetar;l and_ the Ridge~'!ood "East htr1 Addition subdi vision. T11e City Admir~strator e?~res3ed some concern with the drainage patterns in the area 2nd the possibility of flooding in the adjacent park. Commission merrbers also e;qJressed ooncern with the sewer system sui tablii t.:y. COFl}.iISSIC;rfER F?8DERICI(SEl\T l:iO'VED TO TP.BLE FURTHER CCr-IS IDE:R-:{T IOT-J OI'J THE PP~LlljIII~JliRY PLJ1T Ul~TIL TI-IE Tfu;~T PhDJ\TI\TII,JG COl'.Ti'jI1SSIOI\T I,ISETII'~G SO TH..4.T TB~ COI.11ilSS10I'JERS pj\W THE BI\JG1FIZEF~ HP_~\,j1; ADDITIOr~P..L TIt-ill TO RE\lIZl-'T P..ND COl<JSIDER THE PLb~T. COI-0TI~'IISSION1SR T.lJ~LSOl\T Sr~CC)I\lDt;l) TH1.:,; l-.}OTIOl~T. I.IOTIOI\} P ..4.SS~D ;-0. COl,j}lISS lOI'JER LDGJl..S OPPOSED; 1'lITH COl.'}f.:IISS10ITSR TBOT;lPSCJ.J ABSTAltJIl'JG. 9. Pinewood Subdiv~sion - Tom NOOD. Petitioner r"lr5e l'-Joon \'Ias present at the rneetin,g and e:zplained the prolJlem ~~th the hardshell of the final plat; that being the incorrect legal i>Jorclil1g at tl-lis time. COT'~1}"1ISSIOlTER FREDERICI{SE1>J 1,IOv3D TO APPF~O\TE TITS PIN?~T{OCJD SUBDI,\iISIOIJ FIl',Tl~L PL~T, SUBJECT Tel THE . COR~~CT10N OF THE LLGAL DESC~lPT10N Arm 110RD1NG~ P~D APPROVAL Hf THE CI'Yi EI\TGII'JEE2 Pj\TD TI-lE CIYl PT .1\lJl.E~R. COI'.II~'fISSIONER Ll.TCft~S 5EC(}NDBD 'l'}il~ l,:101'101\} e l"lOT lOlJ P J'~SSED 8-00 10. Christian Reality and Builders Building Permits R-a.leigh Cl1ristian~ CIlliCk: Chri5tian, Hncl their legal representativ"e, I:Ir. Cliff L1LYlclberg! 1-Tere present at the meetil1g to discu_ss this item with the Plam1ing Co~~ssion. The City Adrr~nistrator began the cliscu_ssion lTit.b an update for the Commissiol1ers and. otl1ers. present, 011 the situation e..nd prolJlem. Fir. L1L11dberg questio11ed l'rb.at the Ci t~l ~'Jas doing and inc..icated that he felt the Cit3T ~'.Jas re'vokirlg building permits issued to his clients. The City Administrator indic~ted that the permits vJere only suspended temporarily? and not necessarilJT re-\rol(e6_e I-lr. Luncl1)erg indicated. that b~{ lS2.ulng