My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-02-1989 PR MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
P&R Minutes
>
1980 - 1989
>
1989
>
08-02-1989 PR MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:51 AM
Creation date
3/29/2006 8:40:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PRM
date
8/2/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission Minutes <br />August 2. 1989 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MAlULYN VANPATTEN MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE HIRING OF <br />MR. WILLIAM SANDERS OF SANDERS AND ASSOCIATES. INC. FOR THE COMPLETION OF <br />AN ELK RIVER PARKS MASTER PLAN. PARK AND RECREATION SURVEY. AND TWO FOCUS <br />AREA PARK STUDIES. BYRON HOUGHTELIN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION <br />CARRIED 6-0. <br /> <br />6. Park Dedication Fees Review <br /> <br />The Commission reviewed a 6/27/89 memo from the Building and Zoning <br />Administrator. Stephen Rohlf. regarding Planning Commission discussion on <br />park dedication fees for commercial and industrial development. The memo <br />from Stephen included park dedication comparisons from other communities <br />where park dedication fees are obtained for commercial and industrial <br />development. The recommendation from the Planning Commission was that <br />these fees should be obtained on a per unit bases with one acre being <br />designated as a unit and that the charge should be $2.000 per unit. The <br />Park and Recreation Commission concurred with the need to collect this <br />fee based on the spin-off demands in the Park and Recreation area that is <br />caused by commercial and industrial development. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />BYRON HOUGHTELIN MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROV AI. OF THE <br />$2.000 PER UNIT (1 ACRE) PARK DEDICATION FEE FOR NEW COMMERCIAL AND <br />INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS AND FURTHER THAT THE CITY COUNCIL BE ADVISED or <br />THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMI SSION CONCERNS OF ABOUT OBTAINING FEES ON <br />PROPERTIES ALREADY SUBDIVIDED WHICH TO NOT YET HAVE DEVELOPMENT. MARILYN <br />VANPATTEN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0. <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />Staff Updates <br /> <br />The City Administrator provided the Commission with a brief review of the <br />proposed 1990 Parks Budget and Recreation Budget. In general terms. both <br />budgets are proposed to increase. The most significant increase in the <br />Recreation Budget relates to the fee for the Park Master Plan Consultant <br />and for the Senior Citizen Coordinator within the Community Education <br />budget. The most significant increase in the Parks Budget was the <br />allocation of $10.000 for Capital improvements which have not been <br />identified at this time. The Administrator indicated that funds are <br />planned to be placed in this category. as there are typically projects <br />that are desired which are not even known when the budget is approved. <br /> <br />Street/Park Superintendent. Philip Rals. reviewed with the Commission the <br />current expenditures that have taken place at the softball complex <br />including staff time and operating expenses. <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />Other Business <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Chairman O'Brien questioned whether or not there was a need for a dock at <br />the Lion's Park pond considering the new publicity regarding fish being <br />caught in the pond. It was the general consensus of the staff and <br />Commission that such a dock was not needed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.