Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Minutes <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />August 23, 2005 <br />--------------------------- <br /> <br />1.THE BUILDING SHALL COMPY WITH ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING <br />AND FIRE CODES. <br /> <br />2.THE COOLING TOWERS ON THE ABOVE-GROUND STORAGE TANKS <br />SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. <br /> <br />3.THE BUILDING DESIGN SHALL BE MODIFIED TO MEET THE <br />CHANGE IN DEPTH REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 30-1294 (4) D OF <br />THE CITY CODE. <br /> <br />4.THE SCREENING WALL SHALL BE EITHER INTEGRALLY COLORED <br />OR EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE PANELS. <br /> <br />5.ALL COMMENTS OF THE CITY ENGINEER SHALL BE ADDRESSED. <br /> <br />6.ALL COMMENTS OF SHERBURNE COUNTY SHALL BE ADDRESSED. <br /> <br /> MOTION CARRIED 7-0. <br /> <br />5.7. Request by New Century Land Development for Land Use Map Amendment from CC <br />(Community Commercial) to UR (Urban Residential), Public Hearing – Case No. LU 05-05 <br /> <br />5.8. Request by New Century Land Development for Rezoning from C3 (Highway Commercial) <br />to PUD (Planned Unit Development), Public Hearing – Case No. ZC 05-03 <br /> <br />5.9. Request by New Century Land Development for Preliminary Plat (Heritage Maples), Public <br />Hearing – Case No. P 05-16 <br /> <br />5.10. Request by New Century Land Development for Conditional Use Permit for Residential <br />Planned Unit Development, Public Hearing – Case No. CU 05-17 <br /> <br /> Planner Chris Leeseberg reviewed the request by New Century Land Development for a <br />land use map amendment, zone change, preliminary plat and conditional use permit for a <br />residential planned unit development (PUD)) located between the West Oaks subdivision <br />and Highway 10, east of Waco Street and the Big Lake Township boundary. Mr. Leeseberg <br />explained the reasons why staff does not support the land use amendment and rezoning. He <br />reviewed the proposed project layout of lots and streets for the 52 townhouse lots. Staff <br />recommends tabling of the request to the September 27 meeting in order for the applicant <br />th <br />to submit revised plans, building elevations and a revised narrative supporting the request for <br />a PUD. Staff also recommends that the Commission extend the 60 Day Rule another 60 <br />days to November 24, 2005. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Stevens stated that he was disappointed in the proposal, after the workshop <br />discussion of the project. He asked how the R3 zoning would change the project. Mr. <br />Leeseberg noted that there would be a significant drop in the number of units that would be <br />allowed. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Offerman asked if all four components of the request are recommended to <br />be tabled. Mr. Leeseberg stated yes. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Westgaard asked where the service road currently ends. Mr. Leeseberg stated <br />that it stops at Big Lake Township on the east, and at Waco Street in the City of Elk River. <br /> <br /> Chair Anderson opened the public hearing. <br /> <br /> Daniel Lestico, 18677 144 Street, Big Lake Township – Asked if the trees he has <br />th <br />planted on the north side of the service road will be impacted, and if there would be a berm <br /> <br />